SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 20118

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J
Sunil Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
South Eastern Coal Fields Ltd. – Respondent
WPS No. 3780 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Chandresh Shrivastava
For the Respondents: Sudhir Kumar Bajpai

A request for correction of date of birth in service records made at the fag-end of a career after decades of service is barred by the principle of delay and laches and cannot be claimed as a matter of right, even if supporting evidence exists.

Headnote:(A) Service Law - Correction of date of birth - Application at the fag-end of service - Maintainability - Delay and laches - Petitioner seeking correction of date of birth after 27 years of service and just months before retirement - Held, application is hit by inordinate delay - Courts should be circumspect in allowing such requests especially when it affects potential promotional avenues of other employees - (Paras 4, 7, 8, 14)

(B) Service Law - Evidence - Conclusiveness - Burden of proof - Mere submission of educational certificates does not grant an automatic right to correction especially where the entry in service record remained unchallenged for decades - (Paras 8, 13)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a Senior Store Keeper, sought to correct his date of birth from 17.08.1963 to 27.04.1965 in his service records, claiming an initial error. He filed the representation in 2015, which was rejected by the employer. After a previous High Court direction to reconsider, it was again rejected, leading to the current writ petition.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner sat on his rights for over 27 years and initiated the challenge only at the fag-end of his career. Citing Supreme Court precedents, the court held such claims to be barred by delay and laches.

Issues: Whether a request for correction of date of birth in service records can be entertained when made after 27 years of service and on the verge of retirement.

Ratio Decidendi: An application for correction of date of birth cannot be claimed as a matter of right, especially when made at the fag-end of service, as it impacts the promotional prospects of other employees and is hit by the principle of delay and laches. Result : Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks correction of date of birth based on school records after alleged incorrect entry in service history. (Para 1 , 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding breach of ncwa provisions versus the ground of inordinate delay and laches. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court finds that unexplained long delay in raising the issue precludes the requested relief. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. judicial precedents establish that correction of birth dates at the fag-end of service is impermissible. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. petition is dismissed due to delay and because the petitioner already reached superannuation. (Para 14 , 15)

1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs :

“10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be

pleased to call for the entire record

pertaining to the case of the petitioner.

10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be

pleased to quash the letter dated

24.03.2023 issued by respondent

authorities.

10.3 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be

further pleased to direct the respondents to

correct the date of birth of the petitioner as

27.04.1965 in his service record.

10.4 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be

further pleased to direct the respondent

authorities not to retire the petitioner

considering his date of birth as 17.08.1963

and allow the petitioner to continue his

services till his date of superannuation

considering his date of birth as

27.04.1965.

10.5 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble

Court may deems fit and proper may also

be awarded to the petitioner including the

cost of the petition”

2. Facts of the case, in a nutshell, are that the petitioner was employed as the Senior Store Keeper at Sub Area Jhilmili, Area Baikunthpur, District Koria (C.G.) with the respondent company. He was initially appointed as a General Mazdoor Category-I (piece-rated workman) on 16.08.1988. At the time of his appointment, the petitioner submitted his original Class 8th mark sheet, which recorded his date of birth as 27.04.1965. However, due to an inadvertent mistake, the respondent company erroneously recorded his date of birth as 17.08.1963 in the service records, despite the original mark sheet being attached to the petitioner’s service book. The petitioner, in compliance with the appointment order, submitted all requisite documents, including his educational certificates. During the medical examination, however, the petitioner’s age was incorrectly assessed and recorded as 25 years on 16/17.08.1988, based on the wrong date of birth. This discrepancy was also reflected in Form-O. Despite the incorrect entry, the petitioner progressed in his career, and based on his educational qualifications, including the Class 11th certificate, which listed his date of birth as 27.04.1965, he appeared in departmental examinations, was promoted to the post of Clerk on 29.07.1997, and is presently serving as Senior Store Keeper at Pandopara mines, Jhilmili Sub Area. Additionally, the petitioner has also submitted his Dakhil Khariz registers of Class 5th and 8th, which confirm his date of birth as 27.04.1965. The petitioner became aware of the error regarding his date of birth in 2015 and promptly submitted a representation to the respondent authorities requesting correction of his date of birth. This was followed by several correspondences, including letters dated 28.12.2015, 16.01.2016, and 20.01.2016, seeking clarification and providing the required forms (PS-3 and PS-4). However, despite repeated requests, the authorities failed to address the issue. In 1973, the Government of India constituted the Joint Bipartite Committee for Coal India (JBCCI), which governs the service conditions of non-executive employees in the coal industry through the National Coal Wage Agreements (NCWA). Under the NCWA, the terms of service for employees, including provisions for correcting errors in records, are binding on the parties. Implementation Instruction No. 76 of NCWA-III specifically governs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top