Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, J
Resham Lal Dewangan – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Suman Dewangan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court considers evidence of adultery in joint context. (Para 3 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. allegations and counter-allegations regarding conduct. (Para 6 , 18) |
| 3. divorce decree supports disqualification for maintenance. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
CAV Order
1. Since subject matter in the both the revision petitions being common, this Court proceeds to decide the matter by this common order.
2. This both revision petitions are preferred against the order dated 06.11.2024 passed in Mscl. Criminal case No. 637/2022 by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur (C.G.) whereby an application under Section 125 of CrPC filed by the applicant- Smt. Suman Dewangan has been partly allowed and the Court had directed the applicant-Resham Lal Dewangan to pay an amount of Rs. 4000/- per month as maintenance to the applicant Smt. Suman Dewangan.
3. Brief facts of the present case is that the Smt. Suman Dewangan (hereinafter referred as “applicant/wife”) and Resham Lal Dewanan (hereinafer referred as “applicant/husband”) are husband & wife and solemnized their marriage on 11.07.2019 as per Hindu rites and ritual. The applicant/wife filed an application under Section 125 of CrPC on the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
