SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
BRANCH MANAGER MAGMA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SMT. REKHA AHUJA – Respondent
MAC No. 331 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Aditi Diwan
For the Respondents: P.K. Tulsyan

Condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and the granting of interim stay on the execution of a motor accident award subject to the deposit of a specified percentage of the award amount.

Headnote:The matter involves an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of a 30-day delay in filing an appeal against a motor accident award. The appellant sought condonation of delay and a stay of execution of the award, contending that the income of the deceased was incorrectly assessed based on pleadings rather than actual loss of income. The court found the reasons for the delay satisfactory and condoned it. The primary issues were whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned and whether interim stay should be granted. The court reasoned that the period of delay was minimal and the reasons assigned were sufficient. Regarding the stay, the court balanced the interests of the parties by requiring a partial deposit of the award amount to protect the appellant's interest while ensuring the claimants' access to funds. I.A. No. 02 of 2025 is allowed and delay of 30 days caused in filing instant appeal is hereby condoned; if the Insurance Company deposits 75% of award amount with interest component within a period of 60 days from today, the execution of remaining part shall remain stayed.

Order Sheet

Heard on I.A. No. 02 of 2025, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that Insurance Company has preferred this appeal with delay of 30 days. She would submit that delay part has properly been explained. She would pray to condone the delay.

On the other hand, Mr. Tulsyan would oppose.

Heard.

Taking into consideration the period of delay caused in filing instant appeal and reasons assigned in the application, I.A. No. 02 of 2025 is allowed and delay of 30 days caused in filing instant appeal is hereby condoned.

Admit.

Heard on I.A. No. 01 of 2025, an application for grant of interim relief/stay.

Ms. Aditi Diwan would submit that the claimants pleaded income of the deceased 35,000/- per month and the learned Tribunal has assessed income of the deceased based on pleading made by the claimants. She would submit that the source of income was grocery shop and same is being run by the claimants, therefore, there would be no loss of income rather loss of management. She would submit that the execution proceeding is going on. Thus, she would pray for grant of stay.

On the other hand, Mr. Tulsyan would oppose.

Heard.

Taking into consideration the submission made by Ms. Diwan, if the Insurance Company deposits 75% of award amount with interest component within a period of 60 days from today, the execution of remaining part shall remain stayed.

The claimants would be at liberty to withdraw the amount as per terms mentioned in the award.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top