Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Sanjay K. Agrawal, Sachin Singh Rajput, JJ
Priti Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
Vinay Kumar Shrivastava – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction dispute regarding guardianship for disabled persons. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. contention over applicability of special versus general law. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. special laws regarding welfare override general civil procedure code provisions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. appellants directed to approach the competent local committee. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
AFR
{FA(MAT) No.314/2023}
{Arising out of order dated 31-10-2023 in Civil MJC No.7/2022 of the Judge, Family Court, Manendragarh/Camp Baikunthpur, District Koria}
Judgment reserved on: 24-3-2026
Judgment delivered on: 15-4-2026
Judgment (Full) uploaded on: 15-4-2026
C.A.V. Judgment
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
For sake of exposition, this Order is divided in following parts:-
| S.No. | Particulars | Page Nos. |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Challenge in the Appeal | 2 |
| 2. | Question of Law Involved | 3 |
| 3. | Quintessential Facts | 3 |
| 4. | Submission of the Appellants | 4 |
| 5. | Submission of the Respondent | 5 |
| 6. | Submissions of the Amicus | 6 |
| 7. | Legislative History qua Law of Guardianship | 7 |
| 8. | The Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 | 7 |
| 9. | The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 | 8 |
| 10. | The Hin | |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
