SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 8725

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J
Sunil Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPS No. 4673 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Anamika Jain, Mr. Devershi Thakur
For the Respondents: Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Ms. Bharti Khunte, Mr. Vivek Kumar Agarwal

An order terminating or cancelling an appointment on allegations of misconduct or forgery is stigmatic and entails civil consequences, thus necessitating a fair departmental enquiry and adherence to the principles of natural justice (audi alteram partem) before such action can be legally sustained.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Art. 226 - Compassionate appointment - Cancellation of appointment based on allegations of forged adoption deed - Impugned order found to be stigmatic without departmental enquiry - Principle of audi alteram partem - Necessity of prior enquiry for civil consequences. (Paras 7-9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, appointed on compassionate grounds as a Peon following the death of his adoptive mother, had his appointment cancelled by the authorities alleging that his Adoption Deed was forged and in violation of adoption laws. The cancellation was prompted by a complaint from the husband of the deceased. The petitioner challenged this order, arguing it was issued without a fair hearing or inquiry.

Findings of Court:
The court held that any order predicated on allegations of forgery and misconduct that results in the termination of employment and leads to civil consequences for the public servant must adhere to the principles of natural justice, requiring a proper enquiry where the employee is provided with an opportunity to be heard.

Issues: Whether the cancellation of the petitioner's compassionate appointment based on allegations of a forged adoption deed, without conducting a regular departmental enquiry or providing a fair hearing, violates constitutional principles and the right to fair process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that a stigmatic order cancelling an appointment for alleged misconduct cannot be sustained if passed without a regular enquiry, as such action entails severe civil consequences and violates the principles of natural justice (audi alteram partem).

Result: Petition allowed; impugned order quashed; reinstatement directed without back wages, with liberty for authorities to conduct a fresh enquiry.

Table of Content
1. factual background involving cancellation of compassionate appointment based on alleged forged adoption deed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. contentions regarding the necessity of enquiry versus adequacy of show-cause notice. (Para 4 , 5)
3. requirement of departmental enquiry for stigmatic termination orders to satisfy natural justice. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. quashing of the illegal order and directives for reinstatement pending a lawful enquiry. (Para 10 , 11)

(Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery)

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anamika Jain, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Devershi Thakur, Advocate

For Respondent/State : Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Panel Lawyer

For Respondent No.4 : Ms. Bharti Khunte, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vivek Kumar Agarwal, Advocate

SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

C A V Order

1. The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the impugned order dated 13.5.2022 (Annexure P/7). By way of the said order, the petitioner’s compassionate appointment was cancelled on the allegation that he has obtained the same on the basis of a forged ‘Godnama’ (Adoption Deed). It is further alleged that the said deed is in violation of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 (in short “the Act, 1956”) as well as the Hindu Adoption Regulations, 2017 (in short “the Regulations 2017”) and the Hindu Adoption (Amendment) Regulations, 2021 (in short “the Regulations, 2021).

2. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs in the petition :

10.1 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner.

10.2. That, Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 13.05.2022 (Annexure P/7) issued by the respondent and direct the respondent authorities to appoint the petitioner as per order dated 29.05.2021

10.3 Any other relief/reliefs which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted.

3. The factual matrix of the case is that the petitioner was appointed as a Peon on compassionate ground on account of death of Smt. Rajkumari Gupta vide order dated 29.5.2021. Late Rajkumari Gupta was married to respondent No.4-Kishan Prasad Sahu, who allegedly deserted her in 2011 on account of her prolonged sickness and hospitalization. During her illness, Late Rajkumari Gupta was looked after by the grandfather of the petitioner and her own father. The petitioner is the biological son of Shri Lal Bahadur Gupta and Smt. Mitlangini Devi. The said Mitlangini Devi was the elder of sister of late Rajkumari Gupta. From the time of his birth, the petitioner was brought by late Rajkumari Gupta and was cared for as his own son. Late Rajkumari Gupta was deserted by her husband -respondent No.4, who subsequently solemnized a second marriage with one Smt. Neelam in the year 2013-14. They reside separately and have two children from the said marriage. Consequently, the petitioner is the only son (adopted) and the only legal heir of the deceased. Late Rajkumari Gupta served as an Assistant Teacher (LB) at the Government Primary School, Laxmipur, Development Block, Ambikapur. After her demise, an application for appointment on compassionate grounds was duly submitted by the petitioner. An Adoption Deed (Godnama) dated 25.4.2018 was executed in favour of the petitioner during the lifetime of late Rajkumari Gupta. During the process of compassionate appointment, respondent No.4-earlier husband of late Rajkumari Gupta, submitted a letter of consent in favour of the petitioner and on the basis of the Godnama as well as such consent letter given by respondent No.4, the petitioner was appointed to the post of Peon on compassionate ground vide order dated 29.5.2021. A dispute arose among the parties regarding the service benefits of late Rajkumari Gupta. Both respondent No.4 and the father of the deceased-Rajkumari Gupta filed separate application

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top