SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 9251

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
Govt. Of India Through The Ncb Zonal Unit Raipur – Appellant
Versus
Debakishor Padhan – Respondent
CRMP No. 798 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ramakant Mishra
For the Respondents: Neeraj Baghel

In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court should not interfere unless the trial court's view is perverse or impossible; where the trial court's finding is plausible based on the evidence, the double presumption of innocence in favor of the accused must be maintained.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - S. 20 (b) (ii)

(B), S. 27 and S. 29 - Acquittal appeal - Scope of interference - Prosecution evidence riddled with material discrepancies - Independent witnesses turned hostile - Failure to prove safe custody of seized contraband (Malkhana register irregularities) - Lack of evidence against co-accused except inadmissible confessional statements - Trial Court view is plausible - Appellate court should not interfere with acquittal merely because a contrary view is possible. (Paras 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 21)

Facts of the case:
Prosecution alleged that accused were apprehended on a train with 12.395 kg of contraband. Trial court acquitted the accused citing lack of corroborative evidence, hostilility of independent witnesses, and failure to establish the chain of custody of the seized substance. The state appealed against the acquittal claiming procedural compliance by investigative authorities.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the acquittal, finding that the trial court's assessment of evidence was reasonable and plausible. Significant gaps in the prosecution's evidence, including improper documentation of sealing, failure to establish chain of custody, and unreliability of mobile call detail records, vitiated the case.

Issues: Whether the Trial Court was justified in acquitting the respondents given the prosecution's evidence and compliance with mandatory procedures under the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: An appellate court should not interfere with an order of acquittal if the trial court’s view is a plausible one based on record. Interference is limited to cases where the view is impossible or perverse. The presumption of innocence is strengthened at the appellate stage.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. summary of prosecution case and events leading to trial acquittal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. court evaluation of evidentiary gaps, chain of custody failures, and reliability of prosecution witnesses. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
3. principles governing appellate interference in criminal acquittals and final decision. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)

1. This is an application under Section 419 (4) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , filed by the Govt. of India/applicant for grant of leave to file acquittal appeal, and calling the legality and correctness of the judgment of acquittal dated 20-11-2025 passed by the learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Durg (C.G.) in Special (NDPS Act) Case No. 27/2025 (Union of India v. Debakishor and Others), whereby the respondents/accused persons have been acquitted of the charge under Section 20 (b) (ii) (B) read with Section 29 and 27 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short “NDPS Act”), arising out of Crime No. 01/2025 registered at Police Station Narcotic Control Bureau, Raipur, District Raipur.

2. The prosecution’s case in brief is that on 04-03-2025, the Inspector of the Narcotics Control Bureau, Regional Office, Raipur, received an order for a search campaign on the Puri-Durg Express train, its general and sleeper coaches, between Raipur and Durg, along with the RPF team. In compliance of the order, the joint team of Manish Kumar (P.W. 2) and the RPF team of Durg post boarded the Puri-Durg express train No. 18425, from Raipur Railway Station. While checking, when they reached the S-3 Bogie of the train, they found two suspected persons. On interrogation, they disclosed their names as Debakishor Padhan and Jaimangal Padhan. They also disclosed that they are having 2 bags in which they kept Ganja. The said train reached at Durg Railway Station at platform no. 1 at 12.35 PM, and then the police called two witnesses, Narad Sahu and Dhanraj.

3. The notices Ex. P-8 and P-9 were given to the accused persons, and they gave their consent that they are ready to undergo a search by the police authorities. The NCB and RPF team have also given their own search to the accused persons, but no incriminating articles were seized except the articles required for the search and seizure proceedings. The bag of the accused Debakishor Padhan was searched, in which 6 packets wrapped with brown-coloured tape were recovered. The bag of Jaimangal Padhan was also searched, which also contained 6 packets wrapped with brown-coloured tape. In another bag of Jaimangal Padhan, a Ganchha and a jacket were found. Since the place was full of people and rushed there, for convenience, they have taken to the RPF post, Durg, with their consent.

4. The small quantity of contents of all the packets was taken out, and after examination by the drug detection kit, the positive result of Ganja was found. The packets were marked as 1 to 12. On being weighed, it was found total 12.395 kg. The packets of Ganja and sample packets were refilled in separate bags, and they were marked as P-1 and P-2. The bags were again weighed and separately sealed. Panchnamas of the proceedings were prepared, and seizure memo Ex. P-12 was prepared. Spot map Ex. P-17 was prepared. The seized Ganja was kept in safe custody of the Malkhana of RPF post, Durg and a detailed report Ex. P-2 was sent to Narcotics Control Bureau, Raipur. The FIR under Section 8/20 read with Section 29 of the NDPS Act was registered, and an inventory was conducted by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur. The accused persons, Debakishor Padhan and Jaimangal Padhan, were arrested. The sample packets of Ganja were sent for its chemical examination to the state FSL, Raipur, from where the FSL report Ex. P-61 was received, and the contents of Ganja have been affirmed. Statements of the witnesses were recorded, and after completion of the investigation, a charge sheet was filed before the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top