SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 9357

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
JAY CHOPDA – Appellant
Versus
SANJEEV CHANDRAKAR – Respondent


Digitally signed by SUMIT S K U U M M I A T R 2026:CGHC:16231 KUMAR Date:

2026.04.13 18:51:08 +0530 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 406 of 2026 Jay Chopda S/o Sampatlal Chopda Aged About 55 Years R/o Old Civil Line, Mahasamund, Tehsil And District Mahasamund (C.G.)

... Petitioner(s)

versus Sanjeev Chandrakar S/o Munnalal Chandrakar Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Parsada, Post Bemcha, Tehsil And District Mahasamund (C.G.).

Agriculturist Village Achola, Tehsil And District Mahasamund (C.G.)

... Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shubhank Tiwari, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.)

Order on Board

08/04/2026 1. Heard.

2. Present is a writ petition filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 16.03.2026 passed by learned First Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mahasamund in Civil Suit No. S-10B/2024 whereby the plaintiff’s right to lead evidence have been forfeited and the case has been fixed for recording of the defendant’s evidence.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the petitioner is the plaintiff before the learned trial Court and he prosecuting the civil suit for re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top