##PAGE1##

1

2026:CGHC:15942-DB Digitally NAFR

signed by ALOK ALOK SHARMA SHARMA Date:

2026.04.09

13:05:01 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR +0530

WA No. 277 of 2026

1 - Netram Sahu S/o Hariram Sahu Aged About 49 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer, (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School

Sarai Tarkela, Block - Raigarh, District - Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur,

District Raipur (C.G.)

2 - Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur

(C.G.)

3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

4 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

5 - District Education Officer District Raigarh (C.G.)

6 - Block Education Officer Block - Raigarh, District - Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

7 - Jila Panchayat Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Raigarh, District -

Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s)

2

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ishan Verma, Advocate.

For Respondent/State : Mr. Prasun Kumar Bhaduri, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge

Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice

08/04 / 2026

1 Heard Mr. Ishan Verma, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. Prasun Kumar Bhaduri, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the Respondent/State on I.A. No.01, which is an application for condonation of delay of 33 days in preferring the present

appeal.

2 On due consideration the grounds assigned in the application (I.A. No.01), the same is allowed. Delay of 33 days in preferring the present

writ appeal is hereby condoned.

3 The present writ appeal is directed against the order dated 24.11.2025 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in WPS No.11793/2025, whereby the writ petition filed by petitioners was

dismissed.

4 Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the issue involved in this writ appeal has already been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment dated 13.03.2026 in Writ Appeal No.193/2026,

whereby this Court has held as under:-

3

“17. The entire controversy revolved around the Circular dated 10.03.2017 issued by the State Government with respect to the grant of Kramonnati Vetanman to the Assistant Teachers. It is necessary to notice here the circular dated 10.03.2017, which

reads as under:

छቈኍ(cid:3)सगढ़ शा(cid:8)सन स(cid:8)मा(cid:8)न्य ्ቚशा(cid:8)सन वि(cid:15)भा(cid:8)ग

मा(cid:17)ቔኋ(cid:8)लय माहा(cid:8)नदी(cid:22) भा(cid:15)न, नय(cid:8) रा(cid:8)यपुराti

्ቅमा(cid:8)(cid:17)क एफ 10-1/2008/1-3 नय(cid:8) रा(cid:8)यपुराti दिदीन(cid:8)(cid:17)क 10/03/2017 ्ቚवि(cid:31),

शा(cid:8)सन क समास्(cid:31) वि(cid:15)भा(cid:8)ग, अध्य्ቌ, छቈኍ(cid:3)सगढ़ रा(cid:8)जस्(cid:15) माण्डल, वि(ल(cid:8)सपुराti

समास्(cid:31) वि(cid:15)भा(cid:8)ग(cid:8)ध्य्ቌ, समास्(cid:31) स(cid:17)भा(cid:8)ग(cid:8)यtiक्(cid:31)

समास्(cid:31) कल क्टस,+

छቈኍ(cid:3)सगढ़

वि(cid:15)षय :- सहा(cid:8)यक शिशा्ቌक. क/ कमा/्ቐवि(cid:31) (cid:15) (cid:31)नमा(cid:8)न ्ቚदी(cid:8)य विकए ज(cid:8)न ((cid:8)((cid:31)1।

सदी(cid:17) भा+ :- इस वि(cid:15)भा(cid:8)ग क(cid:8) समासख्(cid:17) यक पुरिरापुቔኋ दिदीन(cid:8)(cid:17)क

24.04.2006.

-00-

इस वि(cid:15)भा(cid:8)ग क सदी(cid:17) ቝኌभा7(cid:31) पुरिरापुቔኋ ቛኋ(cid:8)रा(cid:8) शिशा्ቌक स(cid:15)(cid:17) ग+ मा9 सहा(cid:8)यक शिशा्ቌक, शिशा्ቌक (cid:31)था(cid:8) ቤኋ(cid:8)ख्य(cid:8)(cid:31)(cid:8) क/ स(cid:8)मा(cid:8)न्य ्ቚशा(cid:8)सन वि(cid:15)भा(cid:8)ग क पुरिरापुቔኋ कमा(cid:8)(cid:17)क एफ 1-1/1/(cid:15) आ्ቚ/99, दिदीन(cid:8)(cid:17)क 17.03.1999/19.04.1999 मा9 विनविहा(cid:31) शा(cid:31)= क अध्यधी(cid:3)न ्ቚथान कमा/्ቐवि(cid:31) 12 (cid:15)ष+ ((cid:8)दी (cid:31)था(cid:8) विቛኋ(cid:31)(cid:3)य ्ቅमा/्ቐवि(cid:31) 24 (cid:15)ष+ ((cid:8)दी ्ቚदी(cid:8)न विकय(cid:8) गय(cid:8) हा?। वि(cid:15)ቈኍ वि(cid:15)भा(cid:8)ग क ሺኋ(cid:8)पुन कमा(cid:8)(cid:17)क 216