SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 9780

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J
Laxmikant Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPS No. 4995 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Priyanka Rai
For the Respondents: Ashutosh Shukla, Baldau Prasad Banjare

The cancellation of a regularized government appointment without adhering to the principles of natural justice, specifically by denying the employee an opportunity of hearing or a show cause notice, is arbitrary and legally unsustainable.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Art. 226 - Cancellation of appointment - Principles of natural justice - Failure to issue show cause notice - Petitioner was appointed as Assistant Grade-III and later regularized - Impugned order cancelling appointment passed after four years without any enquiry or opportunity of hearing - Such action results in serious civil consequences and removal from service - Procedure adopted is in flagrant violation of principles of natural justice and unsustainable in law. (Paras 21, 24, 25 and 28)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a resident of the State of Chhattisgarh, served for approximately 15 years as a daily wager before being appointed as an Assistant Grade-III following resolutions of local governing bodies and approvals from relevant authorities. After four years of service and subsequent regularization, the Commissioner cancelled the appointment based on a complaint without holding any departmental enquiry or issuing a show cause notice.

Findings of Court:
The court observed that the cancellation of the petitioner's appointment after four years, without following the principles of natural justice, was arbitrary and illegal. The respondent authorities were directed to reinstate the petitioner, while liberty was granted to proceed afresh in accordance with the law if they chose to do so, adhering strictly to the prescribed procedure.

Issues: Whether the cancellation of the petitioner's appointment without a show cause notice or departmental enquiry violates the principles of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi: Any action that has the character of removal from service and visits the employee with serious civil consequences must be preceded by strict adherence to the principles of natural justice, including the issuance of a show cause notice and the conduct of a proper enquiry.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. overview of the petition challenging the arbitrary dismissal from public service. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments concerning the procedural validity and jurisdiction of the cancellation order. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
3. violation of natural justice in service termination without inquiry or notice. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
4. final order granting reinstatement and liberty for lawful procedure. (Para 29 , 30 , 31)

1. By filing the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner assails the impugned order of dismissal dated 13.07.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.3/Commissioner, Durg Division, whereby the appointment of the petitioner to the post of Assistant Grade-III, which was earlier made vide order dated 19.11.2019, has been cancelled. The petitioner has prayed for following relief(s) :-

“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash/set-aside the impugned order dated 13-07-2023 (Annexure P-1).

10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deem-fit and appropriate.”

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner, a resident of the State of Chhattisgarh, is duly qualified, possessing a postgraduate degree along with a Postgraduate Diploma in Computer Application, and has also cleared the Certificate in Hindi Shorthand. It is the case of the petitioner that he had been working as a daily wager for the last about 15 years in Janpad Panchayat, Gunderdehi, on the post of Data Entry Operator. Upon a vacancy arising on the post of Assistant Grade-III, the petitioner submitted an application dated 29.07.2019 before the President, Janpad Panchayat, seeking appointment on the said post (Annexure P-2). The said application was placed before the General Administration Standing Committee in its meeting scheduled on 07.08.2019, wherein, after due consideration of the petitioner’s candidature along with two other candidates, the petitioner was found most suitable and a unanimous resolution was passed recommending his appointment (Annexure P-4).

3. Thereafter, the resolution of the General Administration Committee was placed before the General Body of Janpad Panchayat, Gunderdehi, which approved the same after due deliberation (Annexure P-5). On the basis of the said resolutions, the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Gunderdehi, forwarded the proposal to the Collector, District Balod, vide communication dated 17.09.2019 (Annexure P-6). It is submitted that the Collector, Balod, as well as the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Balod, accorded their approval for appointment of the petitioner, as is evident from the relevant note sheets and proceedings (Annexure P-7).

4. Pursuant to the aforesaid approvals, the petitioner was appointed to the post of Assistant Grade-III vide order dated 19.11.2019 (Annexure P-8), and he joined his duties and continued to discharge the same with utmost sincerity and dedication. Subsequently, a complaint was made before the Commissioner regarding the petitioner’s appointment, which was forwarded to the Collector, Balod, and thereafter to the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Balod, vide letter dated 17.01.2023 (Annexure P-9). Upon inquiry, the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Balod, submitted a detailed report dated 23.01.2023, concluding that the petitioner’s appointment was made after due scrutiny, following the prescribed procedure, and with the approval of the competent authorities (Annexure P-10).

5. However, despite the aforesaid position, the petitioner was taken by complete surprise upon issuance of the impugned order dated 13.07.2023 (Annexure P-1) by respondent No.3, whereby the petitioner’s appointment dated 19.11.2019 has been cancelled. The petitioner contends that the said action has been taken in an arbitrary and illegal manner, without affording any opportunity of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top