SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 10116

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
URMILA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
VIKAS KUMAR AGRAWAL – Respondent


2026:CGHC:15034 NIKITA AFR JAIN Digitally signed HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR by NIKITA JAIN Date: 2026.04.01 17:57:40 +0530 WPC No. 3810 of 2021 Reserved on 11/03/2026 Pronounced on 01/04/2026 Urmila Devi W/o Late Muneshwar Sai, Aged About 66 Years, Caste Kanwar, R/o Village Chetwa, Tahsil Kansabel, District- Jashpur (C.G.)

(Non-Applicant No.1)

... Petitioner versus

1 - Vikas Kumar Agrawal S/o Brajbhushan, Aged About 39 Years, Caste Agrawal, R/o Village Kunkuri, Tahsil Kunkuri, District- Jashpur (C.G.)

(Applicant)

2 - Mukesh Kumar Agrawal S/o Ramniwas Agrawal, 3 - Radheshyam Agrawal S/o Ramniwas Agrawal, 4 - Gouri Shankar Agrawal S/o Manohar Agrawal, 5 - Poonam Chandra Agrawal S/o Manohar Agrawal, 6 - Umesh Agrawal S/o Manohar Agrawal, The respondents No.2 to 6 belong to Caste Agrawal, R/o Village Kansabel, District- Jashpur (C.G.)

(Non-Applicants No. 2 to 6)

7 - The Commissioner, Surguja Division (Ambikapur), District- Surguja (C.G.), 8 - The Collector Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.), 9 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bagicha, District Jashpur (C.G.)

... Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate appears along with Shri Sanchit Bhatt, Advocate.

Fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top