SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 10157

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
DEV KUMAR NIRMALKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC/215/2021



##PAGE1##

1

2026:CGHC:15027 Digitally signed NAFR by

SHAYNA KADRI

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPC No. 215 of 2021

1 - Dev Kumar Nirmalkar S/o Shri Vishwanath Nirmalkar Aged About 49 Years R/o Chantideeh Thana Sarkanda Tahsil And District Bilaspur

Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Nagriya Prashashan Vibhag Mantralay Naya Raipur District Raipur

Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2 - Collector, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3 - Anuvibhagiya Adhikari, Karyalay Anuvibhagiya Adhikari Rajasv, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4 - Tahsildar, Tahsil Karyalay Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

5 - Commissioner, Nagar Palik Nigam Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

6 - Upper Commissioner, Nagar Palik Nigam Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

##PAGE2##

2

7 - Karyapalan Abhiyanta, Nagar Palik Nigam Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

... Respondent(s)

(Cause Title is taken from CIS System)

For Petitioner : Mr. Abdul Moin Khan, Advocate holding brief on behalf of Mr. Wahab Khan, Advocate

For State : Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Panel Lawyer

For Resp. No. 5 to 7 : Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Order on Board

01/04/2026

1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:

“10.1 यह कि(cid:4), उ्ቈरवादीगण (cid:4)मां(cid:4) 05, 06 एवं 07 (cid:4)ो कि(cid:18)द(cid:19)शि(cid:21)त कि(cid:4)या जावे कि(cid:4) वे याचि(cid:26)(cid:4)ा(cid:4)ता(cid:27) (cid:4)े ्ቛारा पे(cid:21) आवेद(cid:18)प्ቔ परिरशि(cid:21)्ቖ पी-02 (cid:4)ा कि(cid:18)यमा(cid:18)ुसार गुणदोष (cid:4)े आधार पर (cid:21)ी्ቈ कि(cid:18)रा(cid:4)रण

(cid:4)र।ें

10.2 यह कि(cid:4), उ्ቈरवादीगण (cid:4)ो कि(cid:18)द(cid:19)शि(cid:21)त कि(cid:4)या जावे कि(cid:4) वे याचि(cid:26)(cid:4)ा(cid:4)ता(cid:27) (cid:4)ो (cid:21)हरी कि(cid:18)ध(cid:27)(cid:18) आवास योज(cid:18)ान्तग(cid:27)त ्ቇाम लि,िሙगयाडीह जिज,ा कि0,ासपुर में

आ0ंकि1त आवास (cid:4)ा (cid:4)ब्जा (cid:21)ी्ቈ सौंपे।

10.3 यह कि(cid:4), अन्य अ(cid:18)ुतोष जो मा(cid:18)(cid:18)ीय न्याया,य उचि(cid:26)त समझे उ्ቈरवादीगणों से किद,ाया

जावें।

2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the petitioner was initially

allotted House No. K-04 situated in Village Ligiyadih, District Bilaspur, under the Urban Poor Housing Scheme vide allotment

##PAGE3##

3

order dated 28.05.2014. However, despite such allotment, the physical possession of the said house was never handed over to the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that upon visiting the site, it was found that the said house was already under the occupation of some other person, thereby rendering the allotment ineffective and depriving the petitioner of the benefit intended under the scheme. In view of the aforesaid difficulty, the petitioner submitted an application before the competent authority seeking allotment of an alternative accommodation in lieu of House No. K- 04. Acting upon such request, Respondent No. 06 issued a fresh allotment order dated 15.10.2020, whereby House No. N-01 was allotted to the petitioner in substitution of the earlier allotted house. The petitioner, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the scheme, duly deposited all the required installments, thereby fulfilling all financial obligations. Despite the re-allotment, the grievance of the petitioner persists as the possession of House No. N-01 has also not been handed over. It is contended that the said house is likewise under the occupation of another person. The petitioner has repeatedly approached the respondents by submitting applications requesting delivery of possession of the re-allotted house; however, no effective steps have been taken in this regard. It is further the case of the petitioner that Respondent Nos. 06 and 07 have failed to take any meaningful

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top