IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
PUNIA CONSTRUCTION CO. – Appellant
Versus
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY – Respondent
2026:CGHC:14999-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1364 of 2026 Punia Construction Co. A Partnership Firm Having Its Registered Office At- House No. 30, Sector-13, Part-2, Hissar- 125001, Haryana (Through Its Authorized Signatory)
... Petitioner versus South East Central Railway Through Divisional Engineer Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent (Cause title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner : Mr. Himanshu Upadhyaya, Advocate (through virtual mode) along with Mr.
Shubham Dwivedi, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI Hon'ble Shr i Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri R avindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge
Order on Board
Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
01/04/2026
1.
The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Constitution of India calling in question the legality, validity and propriety Digitally signed by VED of the impugned order dated 16.03.2026, whereby the respondent–
PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date:
2026.04.04 South East Central Railway has terminated the contract awarded to the petitioner, as also the preceding 7-days notice dated 27.02.2026 and 48-hours notice dated 09.03.2026 issued under Clause 62 of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.