2026:CGHC:15171 NAFR Digitally signed INDRAJEET by INDRAJEET HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SAHU SAHU Date: 2026.04.04 13:20:57 +0530 WP227 No. 377 of 2026

1 - Dipti Agrawal W/o Omprakash Agrawal Aged About 43 Years (Aadhar No. - 2577 0466 5296), Presently Residing At House No. 240/2, Kalash Bhavan, Old Civil Line, Side Of Old Rest House, Ward No. 14, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil And District- Rajnandgaon, C.G.

... Petitioner(s)

Versus

1 - Sanjay Kumar Nachrani S/o Late Mohanlal Nachrani Aged About 51 Years R/o House No. 11, Jal Vihar Colony, Ravigram, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, C.G.

2 - Bahurlal Sahu S/o Late Chhedilal Sahu Aged About 54 Years Presently Residing At House No. 175, Ward No. 19, Station Para, Temri, Deopuri, Raipur, Tahsil And District- Raipur Pin- 492015, C.G.

3 - Yatiram Sahu S/o Late Chhedilal Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o House No. 35, Navoday Staff Colony, Mana Camp, Ward No. 8, Mana Camp, Mana, Raipur, Tahsil And District- Raipur, C.G.

4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Collector, Raipur, District - Raipur, C.G.

... Respondent(s)

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

For Petitioner : Shri Sunil Otwani, Sr. Advocate and Shri Hari Agrawal, Advocate.

For Respondent No.1 : Shri Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate.

For State : Ms. Richa Sahu, Panel Lawyer.

Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J

Order on Board

01.04 . 202 6

1. The present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner against the impugned order dated 09.03.2026 passed by the Chhattisgarh Board of Revenue, Circuit Court at Raipur (in short, the Board of Revenue) in Revenue Case No.RN/14/R/A-6/4008/2025 whereby the revenue revision filed by the respondent No.1 was allowed and the order dated 06.10.2025 passed by the Commissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur, in Case No.100065/A- 6/2024-25 and the order dated 09.07.2025 passed by the Additional Collector, Raipur in Appeal Case No.202501113000047A/6(A)/2024-25 have been set aside and that the order dated 19.12.2024 passed by Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Raipur, in Revenue Case No.202306111000251/A-6(A)/2022-23 has been affirmed.

2. In the dispute before the revenue courts, the present petitioner Dipti Agrawal not a party. She filed the present writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 09.03.2026 passed by the Board of Revenue along with an application for grant of leave to challenge the order dated 09.03.2026 (IA No.01/2026) claiming that she has purchased the suit property from the respondent No.2&3 through the registered sale deed dated 10.11.2025 and despite being made her as party non applicant before there, the impugned order has been passed and thereby her legal right is prejudiced and therefore she may be permitted to challenge the order dated 09.03.2026.

3. The prayer made by the petitioner for grant of leave depends upon the facts of the case as to whether her right would be prejudiced by the order impugned and therefore this court deem it appropriate to first consider the merits of the case and then to decide the application of the petitioner (IA No.01/2026).

4. The factual background of the case are that, the subject land Khasra No.311/10 area 0.352 Hect. and part of Khasra No.311 area 0.024 Hect. total area 0.376 Hect. situated at village Temri, PH No.115, RI Circle Raipur (1), Tehsil and District Raipur, was initially owned by the respondent No.2&3. The subject land was sold to one Sangeeta Agrawal through registered sale deed dated 29.06.1991. The respondent No.1 Sanjay Kumar Nachrani purchased the subject land from Sangeeta Agrawal through registered sale deed dated 07.02.1997 which was executed by her power of attorney Salik Ram Barnwal. At that time the name of respondent No.1 was mutated in the revenue records and he came into possession thereof. Subsequently, on a particular year, by mistake, the name of respondent No.1 could not reflect in the Khasra roster and it was reflected in the name of Smt. Sangeeta Agrawal who was the