2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 10266
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAMCHAND SAHU – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA SAHU – Respondent
MAC/2158/2024
##PAGE1##
1
AMITA
2026:CGHC:15180 DUBEY NAFR
Digitally signed by AMITA DUBEY HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Date:
2026.04.13
18:51:05 +0530 MAC No. 2158 of 2024
Ramchand Sahu S/o Mansharam Sahu Aged About 47 Years R/o Village- Magarlotha, Post- Tedhesara, Tehsil And District- Durg, C.G. (Alleged Owner)
(Correct Spelling Mentioned)
--- Appellant versus
1 - Krishna Sahu S/o Toman Lal Sahu Aged About 22 Years R/o Kodhenvagaon, Post- Khairagarh, P S And Tehsil- Khairagarh Gandai, Now
District- Khairagarh- Chhuikhadan-Gandai, C.G. (Driver)
2 - Toman Lal Sahu S/o Late Lokuram Sahu Aged About 56 Years R/o Kodhenvagaon, Post- Khairagarh, P S And Tehsil- Khairagarh Gandai, Now
District- Khairagarh- Chhuikhadan-Gandai, C.G. (Owner)
3 - Smt. Kaushilya Bai W/o Late Jeevrakhan Verma Aged About 65 Years R/o Kodhenvagaon, Post- Khairagarh, P S And Tehsil- Khairagarh Gandai, Now
District- Khairagarh- Chhuikhadan-Gandai, C.G. (Claimant)
4 - Ajesh Verma S/o Late Jeevrakhan Verma Aged About 32 Years R/o Kodhenvagaon, Post- Khairagarh, P S And Tehsil- Khairagarh Gandai, Now
District- Khairagarh- Chhuikhadan-Gandai, C.G. (Claimant)
5 - Amaru Verma S/o Late Jeevrakhan Verma Aged About 30 Years R/o Kodhenvagaon, Post- Khairagarh, P S And Tehsil- Khairagarh Gandai, Now
District- Khairagarh- Chhuikhadan-Gandai, C.G. (Claimant)
--- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Appellant : Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate. For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Anukul Biswas, Advocate.
For Respondent No. 2 : None present.
##PAGE2##2
For Respondents No. 3 to 5 : Ms. Anushka Tripathi, Advocate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And
MAC No. 1889 of 2024
Krishna Sahu S/o Toman Lal Sahu Aged About 22 Years R/o Village - Kodenawagaon, Post - Khairagarh, Police Station And Tahsil - Khairagarh, Gandai, District Rajnandgaon, Now Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai,
Chhattisgarh. (Driver) (Non Applicant No. 1)
---Appellant Versus
1 - Smt. Kaushilya W/o Late Jeevrakhan Verma, Aged About 65 Years R/o Village -Kodenawagaon, Post - Khairagarh, Police Station And Tahsil - Khairagarh, Gandai, District Rajnandgaon, Now Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-
Gandai, Chhattisgarh. (Claimants)
2 - Ajesh Verma S/o Late Jeevrakhan Verma Aged About 32 Years R/o Village -Kodenawagaon, Post - Khairagarh, Police Station And Tahsil - Khairagarh, Gandai, District Rajnandgaon, Now Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-
Gandai, Chhattisgarh. (Claimants)
3 - Amru Verma S/o Late Jeevrakhan Verma Aged About 30 Years R/o Village -Kodenawagaon, Post - Khairagarh, Police Station And Tahsil - Khairagarh, Gandai, District Rajnandgaon, Now Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-
Gandai, Chhattisgarh. (Claimants)
4 - Toman Lal Sahu S/o Late Lokuram Sahu, Aged About 56 Years R/o Village -Kodenawagaon, Post - Khairagarh, Police Station And Tahsil - Khairagarh Gandai, District Rajnandgaon, Now Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-
Gandai, Chhattisgarh. (Non-Applicant No. 2)
5 - Ramchandra Sahu S/o Mansharam Sahu Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Magarlota, Post - Tedesara, Tahsil And District -Durg, Chhattisgarh.
(Non-Applicant No. 3)
--- Respondents
##PAGE3##3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Appellant : Mr. Anukul Biswas, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 3 : Ms. Anushka Tripathi, Advocate.
For Respondents No. 2 & 4 : None present.
For Respondent No. 5 : Ms. SiddhiTiwari, Advocate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sachin Singh Rajput}
Order on Board
01/04/2026
1. In these two appeals, an award dated 25.07.2024 passed by the Upper Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Khairagarh, Revenue District Khairagarh- Chhuikhadan-Gandai (C.G.), Civil District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) in Claim Case No. 64 / 2022 is under challenge, thus, they are being heard together and
decided by this common order.
2. The appellant in MAC No. 2158 of