SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 10362

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
ARJUN YADAV @ GOLU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


2026:CGHC:18917-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 97 of 2025 Arjun Yadav @ Golu S/o- Balaram Yadav Aged About 34 Years R/o- Karma Chowk Nimora, Police Station- Rakhi, Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.)

... Appellant versus

1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Police of Police Station- Rakhi, District- Raipur (C.G.)

2 - XYZ Nil ... Respondent For Appellant : Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shr i Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice .

24.04.2026

1. Heard Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Sourabh Sahu, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent.

ROHIT KUMAR 2. Though the matter is listed today for hearing on I.A. No. 01 of CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2025 (application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail), however, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is taken up for final hearing.

3. Learned State counsel submits that notice issued to the father of the victim (PW-2) has been duly served; howev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top