IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SMT. BINDA BAI SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPCR/229/2026
##PAGE1##
1
2026:CGHC:18854-DB
Digitally signed
by SAGRIKA
SAGRIKA AGRAWAL
AGRAWAL D 20a 2te 6:
.04.25 NAFR
16:09:08
+0530
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPCR No. 229 of 2026
Smt. Binda Bai Sahu W/o Late Guhri Sahu Aged About 60 Years R/o
Ward No. 05, Chikhali, Near Shiv Mandir, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil And
District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home
Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
2 - Director General Of Police Directorate Indirawati Bhawan, Raipur,
District Raipur Chhattisgarh
3 - Superintendent Of Police Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.)
4 - The Station House Officer Police Station Kotwali, Rajnandgaon,
District Rajnandgaon (C.G.)
5 - Pawan Kumar Chouhan S/o Late Hawa Singh Aged About 25 Years
R/o Koshtha Para, Tilai, Tahsil Berla, District Bemetara (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mirza Hafeez Baig, Advocate
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anusha Naik, Dy. G.A.
##PAGE2##2
Hon'ble Shr i Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Hon'ble Shri R avindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge
Order on Board
Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J .
24/04/2026
1. Heard Mr. Mirza Hafeez Baig, learned counsel for the petitioner as
well as Ms. Anusha Naik, learned Dy. Govt. Advocate for the
State/ Respondent.
2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the
following prayers:
“(i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be
pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, order or
direction to the respondents police authorities to
take fresh enquiry and investigation on offence
of preparing forged documents as registered
sale deed of the land of the petitioner upon the
registered FIR No. 213/2023 and FIR No.
215/2023 for the offence under section 420 of
I.P.C. against the respondent no. 5 at the
earliest, in the interest of justice.
(ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be
pleased to issue an appropriate writ by directing
the respondent to produce supplementary
challan after completion of re-no. 1 to 3
investigation, in the interest of justice
(iii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the
facts and circumstances of the case, may also
be granted.”
##PAGE3##3
3. The brief facts of the present case are that the petitioner is the
owner of land bearing Khasra No. 368/5 admeasuring 0.80 acre
situated at Village Chikhali, Tahsil and District Rajnandgaon
(C.G.). Being in need of financial assistance for construction of
her house under a Government Scheme, she was approached by
her relative Chetan Sahu, who introduced her to respondent No. 5
for arranging a bank loan. In the process, respondent No. 5
obtained the petitioner’s thumb impressions on certain documents
on the pretext of facilitating the loan. Subsequently, the petitioner
discovered that her land had been fraudulently sold to respondent
No. 5 through a registered sale deed executed by a power of
attorney holder, Kejuram, who had been earlier authorized only to
look after the property. Out of the alleged sale consideration, a
sum of Rs. 7,00,000/- was deposited in the petitioner’s account
and withdrawn using her thumb impression, while the remaining
amount was misappropriated by respondent No. 5.
4. That the petitioner, being an illiterate rural woman, had no
knowledge of the said transaction and had never consented to the
execution of any sale deed. Aggrieved, she lodged a complaint at
Police Station Kotwali, Rajnandgaon; however, the police
registered FIR Nos. 213/2023 and 215/2023 only under Section
420 IPC, treating the matter as a monetary dispute rather than
investigating the serious offences of forgery and fraud.
Dissatisfied with the improper investigation, the petitioner
approached the higher authorities seeking reinvestigation. Upon
##PAGE4##4
preliminary inquiry and recording of statements by the
Superintendent of Police, Rajnandgaon, prima facie offences
relating to forgery and fraudulent execution of documents were
found to be made out against respondent No. 5 and the power of
attorney holder. Despite this, no appropriate action has been
taken, compelling
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.