SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 10479

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ
SHIVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC No. 3684 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Chandrikaditya Pandey
For the Respondents: Smriti Shrivastava

Regular bail may be granted in excise cases if the charge-sheet has been filed, the accused has been incarcerated for a significant period, and the trial is expected to take time, even if the accused has prior criminal antecedents.

Headnote:(A) Regular Bail - C.G. Excise Act - Grant of bail - Consideration of charge-sheet filing, period of incarceration, and nature of allegations outweighs the presence of criminal antecedents when the trial is likely to be delayed. (Para 6)

Issues: Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail despite having criminal antecedents and the seizure of Mahua liquor.

Table of Content
1. facts regarding arrest and seizure of mahua liquor under the excise act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding bail eligibility, criminal antecedents, and the status of the charge-sheet. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's reasoning for granting bail based on incarceration period and trial delay. (Para 5 , 6)
4. grant of bail subject to specific conditions and administrative compliance. (Para 7 , 8)

Order on Board

1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 300/2025-2026, registered at Police Station – Excise Circle Sakti, District – Sakti (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of C.G. Excise Act .

2. The case of the prosecution, is that the Police of Police Station – Excise Circle Sakti, District – Sakti (C.G.) has received a secret information through the informant and on the basis of such information the Police has seized a total of 08 liters of Mahua liquor from the possession of the applicant. Thereafter, the applicant has been arrested by the Police and the offence was registered.

3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case and there are 6 criminal antecedents of the applicant out of which only one is pending. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. He further submits that under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years. The applicant is in jail since 20.02.2026 and trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays for grant of bail.

4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that there are 6 criminal antecedents of the applicant out of which one is pending, and the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. It is further submitted that a total of 08 liters of Mahua liquor has been seized from the possession of the present applicant, therefore, he is not entitled for grant of bail.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused all of the documents available on record.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that there are 6 criminal antecedents of the applicant out of which only one is pending, charge-sheet has been filed against the applicant and he is in jail since 20.02.2026 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, I am inclined to allow this application.

7. Let applicant, Shiva, involved in Crime No. 300/2025-2026, registered at Police Station – Excise Circle Sakti, District – Sakti (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of C.G. Excise Act , be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top