SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 10841

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Naresh Kumar Chandravanish, J
Xyz – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPC No. 1800 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Gajendra Kumar Sahu
For the Respondents: S. S. Baghel

A woman has the reproductive and bodily autonomy to terminate an unwanted pregnancy particularly when it results from sexual exploitation, as compelling such a pregnancy constitutes grave injury to her physical and mental health regardless of the gestational age viability threshold.

Headnote:(A) Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Section 3 - Termination of pregnancy - Sexual exploitation - Petitioner, a mentally challenged woman, sought termination of 23-week-old pregnancy - Medical team opined potential for physical and mental problems in the child and risks to mother's health - Court emphasizing reproductive autonomy and the 'best interests' test, held that forcing the continuation of an unwanted pregnancy resulting from sexual assault violates the woman's right to dignity and health - Petition allowed with directions for safe medical procedure and evidence collection (DNA sampling). (Paras 9, 14, 16 and 17)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a 28-year-old mentally challenged woman and victim of sexual exploitation, sought permission through her sister-in-law to terminate her pregnancy of approximately 23 weeks and 3 days. A court-ordered medical examination revealed that the fetus was at risk of physical/mental abnormalities and that continuing the pregnancy posed health risks to the survivor.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the termination, reasoning that the reproductive rights and bodily autonomy of the woman override other considerations, and that forcing the pregnancy would cause grave mental and physical injury.

Issues: Whether the pregnancy of a mentally challenged sexual assault survivor, which exceeds 20 weeks, can be terminated under the Act of 1971.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the 'best interests' test and the principle of reproductive autonomy, confirming that a woman's decision to terminate a pregnancy, especially when resulting from sexual assault or posing risks to her health/well-being, must be respected without coercion.

Result: Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the sexual assault survivor's pregnancy and health conditions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. statutory framework for termination of pregnancy under the 1971 act. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. judicial precedent on reproductive autonomy and the best interests test. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. final order granting permission and stipulating procedural safeguards. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)

(cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery)

1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, a 28-year-old woman said to be mentally challenged and a victim of sexual exploitation, through her sister-in-law (Bhabhi), praying for the termination of the petitioner's pregnancy under the provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (in brevity, the 'Act 1971').

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, as per FIR bearing Crime No.13/2026 registered at Police Station Sarona, District Kanker on 30.03.2026 for offences under Sections 64(2)(k), 64(2)(m), and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 , the victim (Petitioner) was sexually exploited by the accused, which resulted in her pregnancy of 19 weeks and 4 days as on 27.03.2026. The aforesaid report has been lodged by the sister-in-law (Bhabhi) of the victim.

3. Learned counsel further submits that, because of the aforesaid sexual exploitation, as on 17.04.2026 she is carrying a pregnancy of 23 weeks and 3 days, which has been reported by a doctor in the medical examination. Learned counsel further submits that the pregnancy may be detrimental to the life of the petitioner and may also have significant physical, emotional, social, and economic consequences to her. Therefore, she does not want to carry on the pregnancy or deliver the child, as such, she has filed the instant petition through her sister-in-law seeking permission of this Court for the termination of her pregnancy.

4. On being report sought for by this court on the earlier date of hearing, a Medical Team of 8 doctors of Office of Joint Director cum Hospital Superintendent, Late Smt. Indira Gandhi Memorial, Government Medical College affiliated Komaldev Hospital, District North Bastar Kanker (CG) (hereinafter referred to as the "Government Hospital Komaldev"), vide report dated 18.04.2026, has reported that the victim is carrying pregnancy of 23 weeks and 3 days as on 17.04.2026. Learned State counsel has submitted the aforesaid report today itself, wherein the following point-wise report has been prepared:

"Point No. 1: Examination report regarding the physical and mental condition of the patient—

The examination reports regarding the physical and mental condition of the patient are attached in a total of 06 pages.

Point No. 2: Stage of pregnancy—

The victim is currently in the second trimester of pregnancy. As per the sonography conducted on 17.04.2026, the victim is 23 weeks and 03 days pregnant. In the medical examination, the victim was found to be 24 weeks pregnant. Therefore, the duration of pregnancy found in the sonography and medical examination is approximately the same.

Point No. 3: How harmful would an abortion be for the petitioner—

Since the victim is in the second trimester of pregnancy, during an abortion, there may be a need for Hysterotomy (surgical removal of the fetus from the uterus) in case of excessive bleeding (Haemorrhage), uterine injury, infection, cervical injury, or if the abortion medication is ineffective. All the above complications can be life-threatening for the victim.

Point No. 4: Can continuing the pregnancy pose a threat to the life of the pregnant woman or cause serious harm to her physical or mental health—

Continuing the pregnancy may lead to pregnancy-related complications for the victim, such as high blood pressure (Preeclampsia), premature delivery (Preterm), etc. Delivery related complications such as Cesarean Section, excessive bleeding (Haemorrhage), etc., ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top