2026:CGHC:18100-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 81 of 2025 Dr. Urvashi Phuljhale D/o Dr. Kailash Nath Phuljhale, Aged About 40 Years R/o House No. 5b, Street-1 Sector-9 Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.).

--- Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Home Secretariat, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.).

2 - Police Station Dindayal Nagar, Through The Station House Officer, Raipur (C.G.).

3 - Smt. Vinita Jha W/o Shri Mukesh Jha, Aged About 32 Years R/o Near Yogmaya Temple Kailashpuri, Tikrapara, Raipur (C.G.).

--- Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.P.Sharma, Advocate.

For Respondents No. 1 : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Deputy Government and 2/State Advocate.

For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Anshul Tiwari and Mr. Aditya Dhar, Advocates.

WPCR No. 120 of 2025 Dr. Pravin Rustam Rao Borde S/o Rustam Rao Borde Aged About 40 Years R/o Flat No.-202, 2nd Floor, Mahalaxmi Apartment, Beed Bypass, Aurangabad (M.H.)

---Petitioner(s)

Versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Officer In Charge, Police Station Dindayal Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)

2 - Vinita Jha W/o Mukesh Jha Aged About 32 Years R/o Kailashpuri, Near Yogmata Mandir, Tikrapara, Raipur, Tahsil And District - Raipur (C.G.)

3 - Mukesh Jha S/o Ayodhya Datt Jha Aged About 43 Years R/o Kailashpuri, Near Yogmata Mandir, Tikrapara, Raipur, Tahsil And District - Raipur (C.G.)

4 - Ashish Tiwari S/o Madan Mohan Tiwari Aged About 43 Years R/o Sector-

10, Civic Center, Bhilai, District - Durg (C.G.)

--- Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Akhand Pratap and Mr. Niraj Baghel, Advocates.

For Respondent/State Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Deputy Government Advocate.

For Respondent No. 2 to 4 : Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Anshul Tiwari and Mr. Aditya Dhar, Advocates.

Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge

Order on Board

Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice

21/04/2026

1. Heard Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, learned Senior Advocate, Mr.

B.P.Sharma, Mr. Akhand Pratap, Mr. Niraj Baghel, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Deputy Government Advocate for the State as well as Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Anshul Tiwari and Mr. Aditya Dhar, learned counsel for the private respondents.

2. Since the facts and issues involved in both the above writ petitions are common, they are being considered and disposed of by this common order.

3. In WPCr No. 81/2025, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):

“a. A writ and/or an order in the nature of mandamus do issue calling for records pertaining to case of petitioner from the Court concerned for perusal of this Hon’ble Court, if deem fit.

b. A writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue quashing the Final Report No. 7/25, dated 13.1.2025 filed consequent to registration of FIR No. 0462/2023 dated 12.10.2023 for the offence under Section 420 of IPC and Section 4 of the Chhattisgarh State Upcharyagriha Tatha Rogopchar Sambandhi Sthapnaye Anugyapan Adhiniyam, 2010 and also order taking cognizance by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Raipur, in Criminal Case No. 685/2025 being in utter violation of petitioner’s fundamental, constitutional rights and also amounting to abuse of process of Court and abuse of process of law and liable to be nipped at the bud in the peculiar factual matrix of the case and in the interest of justice.

c. Cost of the proceedings.

d. Any other writs or directions that may be deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

4. In WPCr No. 120/2025, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):

“10.1 A writ and/or an order in the nature of mandamus do issue calling for records pertaining to case of petitioner from the Court concerned for perusal of this Hon'ble Court, if deem fit.

10.2 A writ