SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 11213

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SANTOSHI SAHU – Appellant
Versus
SURAJ KUMAR SAHU – Respondent


Digitally signed by SAGRIKA SAGRIKA AGRAWAL AGRAWAL Date:

2026.04.22

10:29:51 +0530 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 398 of 2026 Santoshi Sahu W/o. Manoj Sahu Aged About 32 Years R/o. Village Hathani, Tahsil Bhatapara, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - Suraj Kumar Sahu S/o. Rambihari Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o. Village Pendri, Post Tarenga, Tahsil Bhatapara, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)

2 - Anandram Sahu S/o. Late Shri Ramgopal Sahu R/o.- Parshuram Ward, Bhatapara, District Balodabzar-Bhatapara (C.G.)

3 - Nirmala Sahu D/o. Late Shri Ramgopal Sahu R/o.- Parshuram Ward, Bhatapara, District Balodabzar-Bhatapara (C.G.)

... Respondent(s)

For Petitioner : Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. C.R. Sahu, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J

Order on Board

17.04.2026

1. Heard.

2. Present is a writ petition filed by the petitioner against the impugned order dated 15.07.2025 passed by learned Addl. District Judge, Bhatapara in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 02/2025, whereby the Misc Civil Appeal filed by the appellant has been dismissed.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is the defendant N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top