SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 11242

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
JETHMAL KOTADIA (JAIN) – Appellant
Versus
KANHIYALAL KOTADIA – Respondent


2026:CGHC:17543 SHOAIB ANWAR SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.04.20 17:43:39 +0530 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 65 of 2026 Jethmal Kotadia (Jain) S/o Late Pukhraj Ji Oswal (Jain), Aged About 77 Years R/o Gandhi Ward, Mungeli, Tehsil And District Mungeli (C.G.)

… Appellant versus

1 - Kanhiyalal Kotadia S/o Late Pukhraj Ji Oswal (Jain) Aged About 72 Years R/o Gandhi Ward, Mungeli, Tehsil And District Mungeli (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Mungeli, District Mungeli (C.G.)

... Respondent(s)

(Cause title taken from CIS)

For Appellant : Shri Ankur Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Shri Lekhram Dhruv, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge

Order on Board

17.04.2026

1.

The appellant/defendant has preferred the present appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, being aggrieved by the order dated 09.02.2026 passed by the learned First Additional District Judge Mungeli (C.G.) in Civil Suit No. 05-A/2024 (Kanhaiyalal v. Jethmal & Another), whereby the learned trial Court has rejected the application filed by the appellant/defendant under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the CPC seeking grant of temporary injunction.

2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top