SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 11596

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
DHARMENDRA KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WPC/1350/2026



##PAGE1##

1

2026:CGHC:14552 NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPC No. 1350 of 2026

Dharmendra Kumar Gupta S/o Shri Ram Narayan Gupta Aged About 47 Years Occupation Business, R/o Tifra, Near Bajrang Hotel, Tehsil And District Bilaspur,

Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner

versus

1 - Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways, Transport Bhawan, New Delhi

2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secreatry, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (CG)

3 - Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG)

4 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bodri, District Bilspur (CG)

5 - Competent Authority/land Acquisitiotion Officer National Highway Project, Address Hig-1, Akash, Abhilasha Parisar, Behind Bus Stand, Tifra, Teshsil And

District- Bilaspur (CG)

6 - National Highway Authority Of India Through Its Project Director, Project Implementation Unit, Address Hig-1, Akash, Abhilasha Parisar, Behind Bus

Stand , Tifra, Tehsil And District Bilaspur (CG)

... Respondents

{Cause title, as taken from CIS}

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Sinha, Advocate.

For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. K. Arun, Advocate on behalf of .

Mr. Ravikar Patel, Advocate.

Respondents No. 2 to 4 : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

##PAGE2##

2

{Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi}

Order on Board

27/03/2026

1. Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been

preferred by the petitioner seeking following reliefs :-

“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to produce the entire record leading to issuance of this Hon'ble

Court.

10.2 That Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to determine and pay lawful compensation /award amount to the Petitioner in respect of land bearing Khasra No. 1520/1 admeasuing 0.42 acres situated at Mouza Hardikala, Patwari Halka No. 03, Tehsil Bodri, District Bilaspur, which has been acquired and

utilized for construction of National Highway.

10.3 Direct the Respondents to pay statutory interest on the compensation amount from the date of taking possession i.e.

02.05.2022 till the date of actual payment.

10.4 Direct the Respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 21.02.2023 submitted by the Petitioner within a time bound period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble

Court.

10.5 Any other relief that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner together

with cost of the petition.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is recorded owner of the land bearing Khasra No. 1520/1, admeasuring 0.42 acres situated at Mouza Hardikala, Patwari Halka No. 03, Tehsil Bodri, District Bilaspur. Some portion of the aforesaid land has been utilized for construction of National

##PAGE3##

3

Highway, but no compensation has been paid to the petitioner yet in lieu there of. In demarcation report (Annexure P-2), it has been reported by the Revenue Authority that 0.20 dismal of aforesaid land has been affected in construction of National Highway. The petitioner has filed representation (Annexure P-3) dated 21.02.2023 before Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur for redressal of his grievances, but the same has not been decided yet. Hence, he prays that this petition may be disposed of directing respondents No. 3 & 4 to decide his

representation (Annexure P-3) within specific time frame.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to allow the limited

prayer made by counsel for the petitioner.

4. Though right to property is not a fundamental right, but the same is constitutional right as has been envisaged in Article 300A of the Constitution of India. Therefore, no person can be deprived o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top