SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 11888

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MUKESH SATNAMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Digitally signed by ANURADHA ANURADHA TIWARI TIWARI Date:

2026.03.25

10:25:39 1 +0530

2026:CGHC:13948-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 1286 of 2021 Mukesh Satnami S/o Shri Govind Satnami, Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Bandoura, Police Chowki Bazar Charbhantha, P.S. Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Respondent (Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

For Appellant : Mr. Abhishek Banjarey and Mr. Veer Verma, Advocates For Respondent-State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice

24.03.2026

1. Heard Mr. Abhishek Banjarey and Mr. Veer Verma, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent.

2. This criminal appeal filed by the appellant/accused under Section

374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) is directed against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 06.08.2021 passe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top