SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 12520

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
M/S DHAR MAHADEV CONSTRUCTION – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC/1209/2026



2026:CGHC:13110-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1209 of 2026 M/s Dhar Mahadev Construction Through Its Proprietor Har Bilash Gupta, S/o Ram Charanlal Gupta, Aged About 70 Years, Having Its Registered Office At Mig-51, Near Celebrity Home, Kabir Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 492099.

... Petitioner versus

1 - The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administra- tion And Development Department, 4th Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2 - Nagar Palika Parishad Bemetara, Through Its Chief Municipal Officer District - Bemetara, Chhattisgarh.

3 - Collector District - Bemetara, Chhattisgarh.

... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Virendra Kashyap and Mr. Sibasish Mishra, Advocates For Respondents/ : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Addl. Advocate General State Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge

Order on Board

Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice

19.03.2026

1 Heard Mr. Virendra Kashyap and Mr. Sibasish Mishra, learned ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Shashank Thakur, Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the State/

respondents.

2 The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:

“10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to forthwith release and disburse the admitted and duly measured running bill amount of approximately 7.20 lakhs, pertaining to the work executed by the petitioner under the work order dated 28.07.2023, which was forwarded for payment on 13.06.2025.

10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to immediately depute competent technical officers to the project site for carrying out physical verification, measurement and recording in respect of the construction work already executed by the petitioner to the extent of approximately 25 lakhs in accordance with law and the terms of the agreement dated 28.07.2023.

10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to pass such further orders or directions as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

3 Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a registered civil contractor carrying on the business of execution of public works in the name of M/s Dhar Mahadev Construction, Raipur, and is regularly undertaking construction works for various local bodies and public authorities within the State of Chhattisgarh. The petitioner participated in an e-tender process initiated by the respondent authority for construction of “Mahila Samriddhi Market Work” with an estimated cost of85.65 lakhs pursuant to Notice Inviting Tender dated 16.05.2023. Upon evaluation, the petitioner was declared successful and a work order dated 28.07.2023 was issued in its favour, followed by execution of a formal agreement on the same date. It is the case of the petitioner that although the stipulated period for completion of the work was eight months, the work could not be commenced immediately due to non-availability of the site on account of standing trees and the requirement of statutory permissions for their removal. Necessary permission for tree cutting was granted only on 06.10.2023, followed by further procedural compliance by the Forest Department. It is contended that the delay in commencement of work was entirely beyond the control of the petitioner and attributable to the respondent authorities. After the site was cleared, the petitioner mobilized resources and commenced the work diligently, completing approximately 30% of the project. During execution, the petitioner submitted a running bill of about7.20 lakhs, which was duly measured, verified and forwarded for payment on 13.06.2025. However, despite such verification, the respondents have failed to release the said admitted amount. It is further submitted that the petitioner has executed additional work

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top