SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 12532

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Rajani Dubey, Radhakishan Agrawal, JJ
Ramesh Kumar Rajput – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPS No. 4469 of 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Reena Singh, Advocate
For the Respondents: Avinash Singh, Ashish Shrivastava, Rahul Ambast, Shatabdi Bagchi, Ishan Singh Rathore, Pritam Kumar Tiwari

The Court held that employees of the State Legal Services Authority are entitled to service conditions, including promotional avenues, on par with other State Government departments; thus, fixing a lower promotion quota (15%) for class-IV employees compared to the standard 25% in other departments is arbitrary.

Headnote:(A) Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Section 6(6) - Chhattisgarh State Legal Services Authority Officers and Employees (Recruitment) Rules, 2012 - Promotion quota - Whether 15% quota for promotion of Class-IV employees to Assistant Grade-III posts in State Legal Services Authority is discriminatory compared to 25% quota in other government departments. (Paras 3, 4)

(B) Promotion - Right to be considered - While promotion is not a fundamental right, it is a normal incidence of service. Denial of promotional avenues for long years despite similarly placed employees in other departments receiving better benefits constitutes a violation of equitable service conditions. (Paras 6, 7, 18)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, Class-IV employees at the State Legal Services Authority, challenged an advertisement for 101 Assistant Grade-III posts, arguing that the 15% promotion quota provided under the 2012 Rules was lower than the 25% quota applicable in other State government departments and was contrary to the principle of parity in service conditions.

Findings of Court:
The Court found that employees, including those in the parent High Court, were entitled to uniform service conditions. It directed the respondents to amend the 2012 Rules to enhance the promotion quota from 15% to 25% for Class-IV employees and consider the petitioners for promotion if found suitable.

Issues: Whether the 15% promotion quota for Class-IV employees is arbitrary, unconstitutional, and discriminatory when compared to the 25% quota available in other government departments.

Ratio Decidendi: Promotion is a normal incidence of service to ensure organizational efficiency. Providing lower promotional avenues for employees in the State Legal Services Authority compared to those in other departments without justification is arbitrary and violates the right to fair service conditions.

Result: Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioners contest exclusion from promotion quotas in recruitment advertisements. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioners seek parity in promotion quotas with other government departments. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. respondents argue promotion is not a matter of right and cite legislative autonomy. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. analysis of existing recruitment rules and discrepancy in promotional quotas. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. right to promotional advancement is essential for effective public service. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
6. need for uniform application of promotional benefits across authorities. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
7. court directs enhancement of promotion quota to 25%. (Para 25 , 26)
The date when the order is reserved The date when the order is pronounced The date when the order is uploaded on the website
19.02.2026 19.03.2026 Operative: -- Full: 19.03.2026

AFR

C A V Order

Per, Rajani Dubey, Judge

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the advertisement dated 04.01.2018 issued by respondent No. 2, whereby applications were invited to fill up 101 posts of Assistant Grade-III; however, no post was earmarked to be filled by way of promotion from Class-IV employees as provided under Rule-12 of the Chhattisgarh State Legal Services Authority Notification.

2. Facts of the case, in brief are that the petitioners were appointed as Peon and Process Server (class-IV employee) and working in the office of State Legal Services Authority/District Legal Services Authority since 2001, 2002 and 2011. On 04.01.2018, respondent No. 02, Member Secretary issued an advertisement thereby inviting applications for filling up total number of 101 posts of Assistant Grade-III. The petitioners have challenged the said advertisement on the ground that as per Rule 6 of Chhattisgarh State Legal Services Authority Officers and Employees (Recruitment) Rules, 2012, the recruitment to the post of Assistant Grade-III is to be made as specified in Schedule-II. Schedule-II stipulates that 85% post of Assistant Grade-III is to be filled up by direct recruitment through competitive exam or by deputation and remaining 15% by way of promotion amongst the Class-IV employees. The qualification prescribed for the post of Assistant Grade-III is that a candidate must have passed Higher Secondary Examination from recognized board or 1st year of graduation from any recognized university and must have passed 1 year diploma in data entry/programming at the speed of 5000 key depressions per hour from government recognized institution. However, for the candidates who are considered for appointment in Assistant Grade-III by way of promotion from Class-IV category, the minimum qualification so prescribed shall not be mandatory. Earlier, the General Administration Department of State of Madhya Pradesh vide its notification dated 23.05.1996 reserved 25% in place of 20% quota for their promotion to the post of Assistant Grade-III vide Annexure-P/04. The Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Development Department in State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur has also issued notification on 01.06.2013, thereby reserving 25% quota for Class-IV employees for their promotion to the post of Assistant Grade-III. However, in the instant case, the respondent authorities while issuing the impugned advertisement instead of reserving 15% or 25% quota for Class-IV employees, invited applications for direct recruitment on the total 101 posts of Assistant Grade-III which is per se illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Chhattisgarh State Legal Services Authority Officers and Employees Recruitment Rules 2012. Hence, this petition filed by the petitioners seeking following reliefs:-

10.1 Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call entire records of the case.

10.2 Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside the advertisement dated 04.01.2018.

10.3 Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top