SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 12759

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CHANDA JAISWAL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WPC/1098/2026



2026:CGHC:13053 AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed NAFR by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.03.19 16:56:00 +0530 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1098 of 2026 Chanda Jaiswal W/o Rajesh Jaiswal Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Rewatpur, Bhakura Tahsil Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.)

--- Petitioner versus

1 - Union Of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry, Of Road, Transport And Highways, Transport Bhawan 1, Parliament Street New Delhi

2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department, Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post Rakhi , Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)

3 - Commissoiner Division Surguja District- Surguja Chhattisgarh

4 - Collector, Surguja District- Surguja Chhattisgarh

5 - Land Acquisition Officer Cum Sub Divisional Officer Revenue, Ambikapur, 6 - Chief Engineer Public Works Department National Highway Zone Ambikapur 7 - Patwari, Village Bhakura, Patwari, Halka No. 52, Rajasv Nigam Mandal --- Respondent(s)

For Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Pathak, Adv.

For Respondent/UOI : Ms. Anmol Sharma, Central Govt.

Counsel For Respondents No. 2, to 5 and 7 : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. Adv. General Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Order On Board

18-3-2026

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner is the owner and occupant of land bearing Khasra No. 538/9 and 538/10 situated at village Bhakura, Tehsil Ambikapur. The respondents are constructing National Highway, to which some portion of her land has been acquired and remaining land about 4 desmil has not been acquired, but the respondent are going to demolish the petitioner’s residential house situated over the unacquired land by changing the alignment of the Highway. He further submits that, once map for construction of National Highway is made, then alignment ought not to be changed. He also submits that, petitioner has filed representation dated 2-3- 2026 before the respondent No. 4 /Collector, Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja. Hence this writ petition may be disposed of directing the respondent No. 3 to decide her aforesaid application within stipulated period.

2. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to allow above

limited prayer.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material

available on record.

4. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of at this stage, with a direction to the respondent 3/ Collector, Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja to decide the representation dated 2-3-2026 filed by the petitioner in accordance with law, within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

Sd/-

(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

Judge

pathak

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top