SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 12766

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
GAYATRI JAISWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPCR/148/2026



2026:CGHC:12859-DB INDRAJEET D IN ig D i R ta A ll J y E s E i T gn S e A d H b U y NAFR SAHU Date: 2026.03.19 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 148 of 2026

1 - Gayatri Jaiswal W/o Vinod Jaiswal Aged About 34 Years R/o Jaijaipur, Police Station - Jaijaipur, District - Sakti, Chhattisgarh.

... Petitioner(s)

Versus

1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director General of Police Police Headquaters (PHQ), Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3 - The Inspector General of Police Bilaspur Range, Bilaspur, District -

Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4 - The Superintendent Of Police District - Sakti, Chhattisgarh.

5 - The Station House Officer Police Station Sakti, District - Sakti, Chhattisgarh.

6 - Amarnath Sahu S/o Phoolsay Sahu Aged About 30 Years R/o Khursura, Police Station Bilaigarh, District - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh.

... Respondent(s)

For Petitioner : Shri Shantam Awasthy, Advocate. For State : Shri S.S. Baghel, Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ramesh Sinha, CJ Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J

Order on Board

18.03.2026 Per, Ramesh Sinha, CJ .

1 The petitioner has filed this petition with the following prayer/reliefs:

“(i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, commanding the Respondent Authorities to immediately execute the arrest of the private respondent, Amarnath Sahu, in connection with FIR No. 0031/2026 registered at Police Station Sakti for offenses punishable under Sections

64(2)(m) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

(ii) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent Authorities to provide immediate and adequate police protection to the Petitioner and her family members to ensure their safety from the ongoing threats and criminal intimidation.

(iii) Monitor the progress of the investigation through the mechanism of Continuing Mandamus, requiring the Respondent Police to submit periodic status reports before this Hon'ble Court to ensure the integrity of the probe and to prevent any further institutional apathy or bias.

(iv) Award the costs of the petition in favor of the Petitioner and against the Respondent Authorities for their manifest negligence and dereliction of statutory duties.

(v) Pass any other such order or relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice, equity, and good conscience.”

2 Brief facts of the case are that, the petitioner who is a victim of offence of rape allegedly suffered by the act of respondent No.6, has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a direction to the police authorities to immediately arrest the respondent No.6 and to properly investigate into the matter. It is pleaded in the writ petition that on her report, an FIR of Crime No.31 of 2026 has been registered against the respondent No.6 at Police Station Sakti for the offence under Sections 64(2)(m) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023. FIR was registered on 23.01.2026, however, there is no substantial progress in the investigation of the case and the respondent No.6 is left free by the police authorities. By the passive act of the police authorities, the respondent No.6 intimidating her for withdrawal of her complaint. The respondent No.6 is an accused in a cognizable offence and he should be arrested without warrant. Since he is coercing the petitioner for withdrawal of her complaint, immediate action is required to be taken against him by the police authorities. The petitioner has made complaint to Superintendent of Police on 12.02.2026 about threatening given to her by the respondent No.6 and his family members and on 16.02.2026 to the Inspector General of Police, Bilaspur Range, however, no action have been taken against respondent No.6 by the police authorities and therefore interference of this court for due, effective and immediate investigation of the FIR is necessa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top