SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 12934

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NARSINGH YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


2026:CGHC:12602-DB AFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 252 of 2024 Narsingh Yadav S/o Late Jageshwar Yadav Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Dundera, P.S. Utai, Tahsil Durg, District Durg (C.G.)

... Appellant/complainant versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Utai, District Durg (C.G.)

2 - Harishankar Yadav S/o Late Jageshwar Yadav Aged About 35 Years R/o Indira Nagar Village Dundera, P.S. Utai, Tahsil Durg, District Durg (C.G.)

... Respondents For Appellant : Mr. RK Jain, Advocate.

For Respondent No.1/State : Mr. Rishi Raj Pithwa, Dy. GA Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal, JJ Judgment on Board (17th March, 2026)

Per Rajani Dubey, J Challenge in this appeal is to the legality and validity of the judgment dated 23.2.2024 passed by the I Additional Sessions Judge Durg in ST No.64/2023 acquitting the respondent/accused of the charge under Section 304 of IPC by giving him benefit of doubt.

02. It is an admitted fact in this case that deceased Daneshwari was wife of Narsingh Yadav and sister-in-law (Bhabhi) of respondent No.2 accused Harishankar Yadav. As per the prosecution case, in village Dundera, the accused, Harishankar Yadav, r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top