SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 13039

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SHIVMANGAL TIRKI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC/840/2026



2026:CGHC:12549 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 840 of 2026 Shivmangal Tirki S/o Mahadev Tirki Aged About 49 Years Caste - Urao, R/o Phoolpur, Chitaghutri, Police Station - Charcha, Tahsil - Baikunthpur, District - Koriya (C.G.)

... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Excise Circle Baikunthpur, District - Koriya (C.G.)

... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Shivam Agrawal, Advocate.

For Non-applicant/State : Ms. Palak Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice

Order on Board

16.03.2026

1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section

483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 136/2025, registered at Police Station Excise Circle Baikunthpur, District - Koriya, (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections

34(1)(A), 34(2) and 59(A) of the C.G. Excise Act.

2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the police of Police RAHUL Station Excise Circle Baikunthpur, District - Koriya, (C.G.), received DEWANGAN an information from the informant and on the basis of the said Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN information conducted a raid and seized total 18 bulk liters of Mahua liquor from the possession of the present applicant. Thereafter, Police has registered an offence punishable under Sections 34(1)(A), 34(2) and 59(A) of the C.G. Excise Act against the present applicant.

3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years. He submits that the present applicant has one criminal antecedent under the Excise Act, of the year 2023, which is pending. He also submits that the charge-sheet has been filed before the competent Court, and the applicant is in jail since 18.12.2025 and the trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays grant of bail to the applicant.

4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed before the competent Court. She also submits that from the possession of the present applicant total 18 bulk liters of Mahua liquor was seized. She further submits that the present applicant has one criminal antecedent in the similar nature, which shows that the present is a habitual offender, therefore, he is not entitled for grant of bail.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case-

diary.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that the present applicant has one criminal antecedent under the Excise Act, of the year 2023 which is pending, further considering the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed before the competent Court and he is in jail since 18.12.2025 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, therefore, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the present applicant.

7. Accordingly, the bail application of the applicant is allowed. Let the applicant, Shivmangal Tirki, involved in Crime No. 136/2025, registered at Police Station Excise Circle Baikunthpur, District - Koriya, (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 34(1)(A), 34(2) and 59(A) of the C.G. Excise Act, be released on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial cour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top