2026:CGHC:11535 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 221 of 2026 Smt. Firdos Ahmad W/o Naim Ahmad Aged About 41 Years R/o Behind Raza Masjid, Moudahapara, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) --- Petitioner versus Smt. Usha Jindal W/o Shri Mukesh Jindal, R/o Quarter No. 206, New Delhi Sweets, Samta Colony, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.), At Present R/o Near O.P. Jindal, School, Near Jindal Provisional Store, Kharsiya Road, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) --- Respondent WP227 No. 222 of 2026 Smt. Firdos Ahmad W/o Naim Ahmad Aged About 41 Years R/o Behind Raza Masjid, Moudahapara, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) ---Petitioner Versus Smt. Usha Jindal W/o Shri Mukesh Jindal R/o Quarter No. 206, New Delhi Sweets, Samta Colony, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.), At Present R/o Near O.P. Jindal School, Near Jindal Provisional Store, Kharsiya Road, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) --- Respondent For Petitioner : Shri Shikhar Sharma and Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocates For Respondent : Shri Sharad Mishra and Suraj Patel, Advocates (Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput)

Order on Board dated 10.03.2026 Since the orders under challenge in these two Writ Petitions are one and the same – dated 10.02.2026 and 18.09.2025, they are being disposed of by this common order:-

2. The petitioner in these petitions is challenging the order dated 10.02.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Board of Revenue, Circuit Court, Raipur, CG affirming the order dated 18.09.2025 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Commissioner, Raipur Division.

3. For convenience, the facts are taken from WP(227) 221/2026. The respondent herein filed an application before the Tahsildar, Raipur for making demarcation of her land bearing Khasra No. 172/4, area 0.140 hectare situate at village Gogaon, Patwari Halka No. 107/50. The said application was registered as Case No. 330/A-12/year-2017. The Tehsildar directed the concerned Revenue Inspector and Patwari to submit their report after making demarcation of the said land. Revenue Inspector and Patwari accordingly made demarcation of the said land and submitted the report to Tehsildar. On the basis of demarcation report, the Tehsildar registered the eviction proceedings against the petitioner upon the application made by the respondent under Section 250 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code (for short the (“CGLRC”) and then passed the order dated 22.06.2022 for eviction of the petitioner. Against the demarcation report submitted by the Revenue Inspector and Patwari before the Tehsildar, the petitioner filed a revision before the Additional Collector, Raipur who by order dated 31.05.2023 set aside the order dated 28.07.2018 passed by the Tehsildar in respect of demarcation proceedings by recording a finding that no division is made in the revenue map of the land for which the application for demarcation was made, and that the Revenue Inspector and Patwari have not properly considered the four sides of the land of the petitioner. Additional Collector also directed the Tahsildar to properly demarcate the land and then proceed in accordance with law. Petitioner also challenged the order of eviction dated 22.06.2022 by filing appeal before the Sub Divisional Officer, Raipur in which respondent also appeared, contested the case, filed written submission as also the copy of the order dated 31.05.2023 passed by the Additional Collector. Sub Divisional officer allowed the said appeal vide order dated 21.06.2023. Respondent however is stated to have not challenged the said order dated 31.05.2023 for a considerable period of time in spite of having the knowledge. It however came to be challenged after more than two years i.e. on 03.07.2025 by way of revision before the Commissioner along with an application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Learned Commissioner vide order dated 18.09.2025 allowed the said application for condonation of delay. Against the order dated 18.09.2025, the petitioner filed a re