IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MANIRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPS/2167/2026
##PAGE1##
1
2026:CGHC:10709
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 2167 of 2026
1 - Maniram S/o Fekuram Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Kalcha, Post Jamdih,
Udaypur, District Surguja (C.G.)
2 - Shrawan Kumar S/o Ratan Das Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Baijnathpur,
District Surajpur (C.G.)
... Petitioners
Versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Public Work Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi
Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.)
2 - Engineer In Chief Public Work Department, Sirpur Bhavan, Raipur, District
Raipur (C.G.)
3 - Chief Engineer Public Work Department Circle Ambikapur, District Surguja
(C.G.)
4 - Superintendent Engineer Public Work Department Circle Ambikapur, District
Surguja (C.G.)
5 - Executive Engineer Public Work Department, Bha/sadak Division Surajpur,
District Surajpur (C.G.)
6 - Sub Divisional Officer Public Work Department (B And R) Sub Division Surajpur,
District Surajpur (C.G.)
... Respondents
For Petitioners : Mr. Hemant Kesharwani, Advocate
##PAGE2##2
For Respondents-State : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer
SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
ORDER ON BOARD
02/03 /2026
1. Petitioners has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:-
“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be
pleased to issue direction for respondent authorities
for considered the name of petitions for
regularization since after completion of 10 years of
service.
10.2 That, other relief which this Hon’ble Court
may deem fit and proper also, kindly be granted to
the petitioner, in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the Petitioner No. 1 is
working on the post of Care Taker and was initially appointed as a daily-
wage employee on 01.02.2015 and the Petitioner No. 2 is working on the
post of Labourer and was also initially appointed as daily-wage employee
on 01.04.2015 with the respondent department. He contended that the
petitioners are working since last about more than 10 years on the said
post and they have made several oral requests to the authorities for
regularization of their services, however, till date, the respondent
authorities have not considered the claim of petitioners for regularizing
their services and therefore, he prays that direction be issued to the
Respondent No. 1 to consider the claim of petitioners for regularization of
their services. In support of his contention he places reliance upon the
decision of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others v. Umadevi and
Others reported in (2006) 4 SCC 1 and in the decision passed by this
Court in WP (S) No. 2429/2025 ‘Dinesh Patel Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
& Ors. and other connected matters’ decided on 11.04.2025.
3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Respondents/State would
submit that perusal of the writ petition would show that the present
##PAGE3##3
petitioners have not submitted any representation before the respondent
authorities raising their grievance as raised in this writ petition and
therefore, if the petitioners submit a detailed representation before the
concerned authorities, it will be considered and decided in accordance
with law.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents
placed on record.
5. The grievance of petitioner as projected in this writ petition is that they are
continuously in employment since last about more than 10 years with the
Respondents/State. Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Secretary,
State of Karnataka and Others v. Umadevi and Others reported in
(2006) 4 SCC 1 considering that the daily-wage employee/temporary
employee will not be discriminated to the extent of wages/salary as paid
to the regular employees has considered the regularization of employees
who have been employed by the employer, their service is not illegal but
irregular and is continuous employment since about more than 10 years
and observed thus:-
“ 53. One aspect needs to be clarified. There may be
cases where irregular appointments (not illegal
appointments) as explained in S.V. NARAYANAPPA
(supra), R.N. NANJUNDAPPA (supra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.