IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAJU @ RAJENDRA PARE AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
Digitally signed by SAGRIKA S A A G G R R A I W K A A L A D 20 G a 2 t R e 6 A : .0 W 3 A .0 L
3 NAFR
17:41:50 +0530 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 767 of 2003
1 - Raju @ Rajendra Pare, S/o Gendlal, aged about 32 years, R/o Khorkona, P.S. Rajagamar, Dist- Korba (CG)
2- Kuman Singh, S/o Beeram Singh, aged about 35 years, R/o Simkeda, P.S.
Kartala, Dist- Korba --- appellants(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh through P.S. Kartala, Dist- Bilaspur (CG)
--- Respondent(s)
For appellant No. 1 : Mr. Gaurav Singhal, Advocate For appellant No. 2 : Mr. Shyamta Prasad Sannat, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Supriya Upasane, Govt. Advocate CRA No. 858 of 2003
1 - Purushottam Gupta, S/o Chhotelal Gupta, Aged about 32 years, R/o Laxman Van Talab, Korba, (CG)
---appellant(s)
Versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, Bilaspur (CG)
--- Respondent(s)
For appellant(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singhal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Supriya Upasane, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Order on Board
19/02/2026
1. Both these appeals are arising out of the common sessions trial and common judgment, therefore, these appeals are being heard and decided together.
2. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.