SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 14282

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
Jitendra @ Jeevan Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
CRA No. 1577 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sangeet Kumar Kushwaha
For the Respondents: Vaishali Mahilong

In cases of sexual assault against a minor, the slightest degree of penetration is sufficient to constitute the offence of rape. Age determination based on school records remains conclusive when the authenticity of such records is not challenged by the defense.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 415(2) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 376AB and 511 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 3, 6, 10 and 18 - Determination of age - School records - Evidentiary value - In the absence of a challenge to the authenticity of the school register, entries regarding date of birth are conclusive for determining minority status - Following the precedence of applying juvenile justice norms to determine the age of a victim, school records hold primacy over other forms of evidence. (Paras 12, 13 and 16)

(B) Rape - Penetration - Definition of - The phrase 'to any extent' stipulated in the penal statutes concerning sexual assault makes even the slightest form of penetration sufficient to constitute the offence of rape - Evidence of injury to private parts, coupled with forensic reports of semen presence, corroborates the commission of the offence and negates the defense of mere attempt. (Paras 27, 28 and 29)

Facts of the case:
The appeal was filed against the conviction and sentencing for an offence committed against a minor. The prosecutrix, a school-going child, alleged that the accused committed rape, supported by medical evidence of injuries and forensic reports showing the presence of semen on the clothing of both the victim and the accused. The defense challenged the victim's age and argued that the incident constituted a mere attempt rather than a completed offence due to the lack of evidence for full penetration.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the school register was a reliable document for age determination as its authenticity remained unchallenged. It further clarified that the law does not require full penetration or rupture of the hymen for the offence of rape to be complete, as the statutory language includes penetration 'to any extent'.

Issues: Whether the victim was a minor at the time of the offence, and whether the demonstrated act constituted a full offence of rape or merely an attempt.

Ratio Decidendi: The legal standard for 'rape' includes the slightest penetration of the sexual organ into the victim. Given the medical findings of injury and forensic evidence of semen, the act fulfills the definition of a completed offence. Furthermore, school records are consistent with established legal procedures for determining the age of a minor victim when such records are not rebutted.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. procedural background and factual summary of the prosecution case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. parties' contentions regarding evidentiary sufficiency and the nature of the crime. (Para 8 , 9)
3. determination of the victim's age based on school records and rule 12. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. evaluation of witness testimony and medical/forensic evidence corroboration. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
5. legal interpretation of 'penetration' for rape under ipc and pocso. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
6. final affirmation of conviction and sentence; dismissal of appeal. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)

Judgment on Board

Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

22-04-2026

1. Learned counsel for the State submits that the notice issued to the mother of the victim has been served, however none appears to submit/object the appeal/application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail. Though the matter was listed for orders on I.A. No.01/2024 which is an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail, however, considering the fact that the appellant is in jail since 27-02-2020, with the consent of parties, the matter has been heard finally.

2. The present Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 415(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short ‘BNSS’) against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 22-06-2024 passed by the learned Additional Session Judge, First Fast Track Special Court, POCSO, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) in Special Criminal (POCSO) Case No. 46/2020, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced in the following manner:-

Conviction Sentence
U/s 376 AB of the IPC Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default of payment of fine R.I. for 4 months.
U/s 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short ‘the POCSO Act’) (Since the appellant has been sentenced Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default of payment of fine R.I. for 4 months for his conviction under Section 376 AB of the IPC, no separate sentence has been awarded to him for his conviction under Section 6 of the POCSO Act.)

3. The prosecution case in brief is that the mother of the the victim, PW-2 lodged a written complaint to the police station Mandir Hasaud on 26-02-2020 Ex.-P/4 alleging in it that at about 03:30 p.m. her daughter informed her that the appellant dragged her towards field and in isolated place he opened his clothes and force her to massage of his penis and thereafter he removed her underwear also, laid her down on the ground and tried to make sexual intercourse with her, however he could not succeeded and left her. He gave her Rs.50/- and asked her not to disclose the incident to anyone. On the basis of her written complaint, the FIR Ex.-P/26 has been registered against the appellant for the offence under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim was sent for her medical examination to Primary Health Center Mandir Hasaud where she was medically examined by PW-4 Doctor Vijay Laxmi Anant and after her medical examination gave report Ex.-P/9. While medically examining the victim, the doctor has noticed abrasion present on her private part and redness was also present and she opined that she had gone through physical abuse and attempt to sexual intercourse within 12 to 20 hours prior to MLC. She was referred to Radiologist for age confirmation. The underwear of the victim has been seized vide seizure memo Ex.-P/2. Spot map Ex.-P/7 was prepared by the police and Ex.-P/10 was prepared by Patwari. With respect to the age and date of birth of the victim police has seized school register Ex.-P/27 vide seizure memo Ex.-P/17 and after retaining its attested truce copy Ex.-P/27C, the original register was returned back to the school. The progress report card of Class 5 of the victim has also been seized which is Article A1. The appellant was arrested on 27-02-2020 and he too was sent for his med

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top