SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 14287

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
Lakhmuram Baghel – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
CRA No. 1057 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Pravin Kumar Tulsyan, Karan Kumar Baharani
For the Respondents: Sourabh Sahu

School records serve as primary evidence for age determination of a victim. In sexual assault cases involving minors, scientifically validated DNA evidence identifying the accused as the parent of the resulting child constitutes conclusive proof of the offense, rendering the defense of consent legally and factually unsustainable.

Headnote:(A) Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Section 6 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 376(3) and 506 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 374(2) - Determination of age - School records are statutory documents and admissible under Section 35 of the Indian Evidence Act - Procedure under Rule 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007 provides a reliable basis for determining the age of a victim - Matriculation certificate or, in its absence, school records are conclusive proof of age - Once proven minor, consent is legally irrelevant. (Paras 11, 12, 17)

(B) Evidence - DNA Profiling - DNA test report is a scientifically accurate and reliable means of establishing guilt - In cases of rape, DNA and medical reports act as crucial circumstantial and scientific evidence - Burden lies on the defense to rebut scientific accuracy or establish tampering of samples. (Paras 20, 21, 28)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted for rape and sexual offenses against a minor victim, resulting in a pregnancy and the birth of a child. The defense argued that the victim was a major and the relationship was consensual, challenging the evidentiary value of school records used to establish the victim's age.

Findings of Court:
The Court held that the school records are the most reliable evidence for determining the age of a minor under the prescribed statutory rules. The DNA analysis confirmed the appellant as the biological father, leaving no doubt regarding the commission of the act.

Issues: The central issues were: 1) The standard of evidence required to determine the age of the victim; 2) The evidentiary value of scientific DNA testing in proving sexual assault.

Ratio Decidendi: School records maintained in the ordinary course of business are admissible and reliable for age determination. When scientific DNA evidence conclusively links an accused to the biological consequence of a sexual act, and the victim is proven to be a minor, the lack of consent is absolute.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. procedural background and factual overview of the prosecution case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. apposing contentions regarding victim's minority and evidentiary value. (Para 7 , 8)
3. conclusive determination of victim's age based on school records. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. reliability of dna evidence and scientific proof of sexual intercourse. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
5. court affirmation of conviction based on evidence and dismissed appeal. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)

Judgment on Board

Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

22-04-2026

1. Learned counsel for the State submits that the notice issued to the father of the victim has been served, however none appears to submit/object the appeal/application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail. Though the matter was listed for orders on I.A. No.01/2024 which is an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail, however, considering the fact that the appellant is in jail since 30-08-2021, with the consent of parties, the matter has been heard finally.

2. The present Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 19-03-2024 passed by the learned Additional Session Judge, (F.T.S.C.), POCSO Act, Bastar place Jagdalpur (C.G.) in Special Session Case No. 77/2021, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced in the following manner:-

Conviction Sentence
U/s 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short ‘the POCSO Act’) R.I. for 20 years with fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default of payment of fine further R.I. for one year.
U/s 376(3) of the IPC (Since the appellant has been sentenced R.I. for 20 years with fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default of payment of fine further R.I. for one year for his conviction under 6 of the POCSO Act, no separate sentence has been awarded to him for his conviction under Section Section 376(3) of the IPC)

3. The prosecution case in brief are that, the victim lodged FIR on 30-08-2021 Ex.-P/1 against the appellant with the allegation that in the year 2019 when she was studying in class 7, his neighbour, i.e., the appellant was used to come to her house for watching T.V. At the time when her parents had gone to their work and she was alone in her house he made forceful physical relation with her and threatened her not to disclose the incident to anyone otherwise he will brutally beat her. Thereafter, he regularly made physical relation with her at bamboo tree plant after threatening her and despite her protest he could stop. When she conceived pregnancy for about 6-7 months her mother took her to the doctor and when her pregnancy was disclosed to her mother she disclosed the incident to her. She gave birth to a female child on 04-12-2020 and the appellant threw her from his house. The victim was sent for her medical examination to Maharani Hospital Jagdalpur where she medically examined by PW-7 Doctor Anjana Bhaskar who gave her report Ex.-P/17. According to the medical report of the victim, the doctor has opined that no definite opinion can be given regarding rape. With respect to her age and date of birth police has seized the mark sheet of Class 8th of the victim, Article 1 vide seizure memo Ex.-P/2. The school register and certificate have also been seized from the school vide seizure memo Ex.-P/14 and after retaining its attested true copy Ex.-P/15C the original school register was returned back to the school. As per the school register Ex.-P/15C and certificate issued by the Head Master of the school, the date of birth of the victim is 17-05-2006. Spot map Ex.-P/4 was prepared by police. The appellant was arrested on 30-08-2021 and he too was sent for his medical examination to Civil Hospital Bhanpuri where he was medically examined by Doctor F.L. Nishad who gave his report Ex.-P/21. According to the MLC report of the appell

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top