SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 14349

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
ANAND AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC/1891/2026



##PAGE1##

1

Digitally

signed

2026:CGHC:18879

by

SHAYNA

KADRI

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPC No. 1891 of 2026

1 - Anand Agrawal S/o Shri Pyare Lal Agrawal Aged About 52 Years R/o

Agrasen Chowk Ward No. 8, District- Korba (C.G.)

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of

Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya,

Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)

2 - Collector, District- Korba (C.G.)

3 - Deputy Collector, Office Of Collectorate (Land Acquisition Branch),

District- Korba (C.G.)

4 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Korba District- Korba (C.G.)

5 - Assistant Superintendent, Land Acquisition Branch, District- Korba

(C.G.)

6 - Revenue Inspector- Korba -1 District- Korba (C.G.)

... Respondent(s)

(Cause Title is taken from CIS System)

For Petitioner : Mr. Achyut Tiwari, Advocate

For State : Mr. Anandi Sharma, Panel Lawyer

##PAGE2##

2

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Order on Board

24/04/2026

1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:

“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may

kindly be pleased to call for the entire

record pertaining to the case of the

petitioner.

10.2 That, The Hon'ble Court may

kindly be pleased to direct the

respondent authorities to finalize the

demarcation proceedings of the

petitioner's said land, in furtherance of

letters dated 19/06/2025

(Annexure-P/2, 20/06/2025 (Annexure-

P/3), 04/07/2025 (Annexure-P/4),

29/08/2025 (Annexure-P/5) within

stipulated time, preferably within a

period of one week in accordance with

law, in the interest of justice.

10.3 That, Hon'ble Court may kindly be

pleased to direct the respondent

authorities to consider and allow the

application /representation filed by the

petitioner (Annexure P/6) in accordance

with law, in the interest of justice.

10.4 That, any other relief, which this

Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper

together with cost of the petition”

2. Facts of the case, as projected, are that the petitioner has filed the

present writ petition stating that he is the lawful owner and Bhumi

Swami of land bearing Khasra No. 215/1/घ, Ward/Halka No. 32,

situated at Village Jhabar, Tehsil and District Korba (C.G.),

admeasuring 0.162 hectare, having purchased the same through

##PAGE3##

3

a registered sale deed dated 25.01.2023. It is contended that

since the date of purchase, the petitioner is in lawful, peaceful and

continuous possession and enjoyment of the said property without

any interference, and his name is duly recorded in the revenue

records, which substantiates his title and possession. It is further

the case of the petitioner that during the subsistence of his

peaceful possession, a political party established its office

adjacent to his land and thereafter started unlawfully encroaching

upon a portion of the petitioner’s property by using it for parking of

vehicles and attempting to raise boundary structures without any

legal authority. Aggrieved by such illegal interference, the

petitioner approached the Collector, Korba, seeking demarcation

of the land. Pursuant thereto, an order dated 19.06.2025 was

issued directing constitution of a team for conducting demarcation

and submission of a report within a stipulated period. However,

despite issuance of notices fixing dates for demarcation on

multiple occasions, the petitioner remained present with all

necessary documents, yet no officer or team member appeared

on site and the demarcation proceedings were not conducted.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite repeated

communications and opportunities, the respondent authorities

have failed to carry out and conclude the demarcation

proceedings, apparently due to extraneous considerations and

political pressure. It is contended that even after submission of a

detailed representation dated 09.02.2026 requesting completion

##PAGE4##

4

of demarcation, no effective steps have been taken by the

authorities, thereby causing serious prejudice to the petitioner. It

is further submitted that the petitioner, being the recorded ow

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top