IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SUNIL AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC/5137/2024
##PAGE1##
1
NAFR
VISHAKHA
BEOHAR
Digitally HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
signed by
VISHAKHA
BEOHAR
WPC No. 5137 of 2024
1 - Sunil Agrawal S/o Shri Bajrang Lal Agrawal Aged About 50 Years
R/o Banaras Chowk, Ambikapur, Tahsil - Ambikapur, District Surguja
(C.G.),..(Objector Before Resp. No. 01)
--- Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of
Revenue And Disaster Management, New Mantralaya Nawa Raipur,
Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.)
2 - Baijnath Keshari S/o Shri Ramlakhan Keshari Aged About 47 Years
Caste - Kesharwani, R/o Rest House Road, Ramanujganj, District
Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.),...(Applicant Before Resp. No. 01)
3 - Gopal Prasad Shrivastava S/o Late Kuldeep Sahai Aged About 68
Years Caste - Kayasth, R/o Ward No. 06, Ramanujganj, District
Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.),..(Non-Applicant No. 01 Before Resp.
No. 01)
--- Respondent(s)
WPC No. 5938 of 2024
##PAGE2##2
1 - Ramchandra Prasad Gupta S/o Shri Laxmi Prasad Gupta, Aged
About 62 Years R/o Ramanujganj, Tahsil-Ramanujganj, District-
Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ----(Objector Before Resp No.1)
---Petitioner(s)
Versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of
Revenue And Disaster Management, New Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur,
Atal Nagar, District-Raipur (C.G.)
2 - Baijnath Keshari S/o Shri Ramlakhan Keshari, Aged About 47 Years
Caste-Kesharwani, R/o Rest House Road, Ramanujganj, District-
Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) -----(Applicant Before Resp No.1)
3 - Gopal Prasad Shrivastava S/o Late Kuldeep Sahai, Aged About 68
Years Caste-Kayasth, R/o Ward No. 06, Ramanujganj, District-
Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ------(Non-Applicant No.1 Before Resp
No.01)
... Respondents
(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Petitioners :- Mr. Akath Kumar Yadav, Advocate
For State :- Mr. S.S. Choubey, G.A.
For Respondents No. 2 & 3 :- Mr. K.A. Ansari, Senior Advocate
appears along with Mr. Rohan Patnaik, Advocate
on behalf of Mr. Aman Ansari, Advocate
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order On Board
24.04.2026
1. As the impugned order in the present petition is identical and
arises out of the same proceedings, the present petitions are
being decided by this common order.
##PAGE3##3
2. By way of these petitions, the petitioner has called in question the
legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 09.10.2024
passed by Respondent No.1, whereby the application preferred
by the petitioners under Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC, 1908 for
impleadment has been rejected.
3. Briefly stated, the case of the petitioners is that Respondent No.3
was originally granted patta of land bearing Khasra No. 78/4, area
4.047 hectares, situated at Ramanujganj. Thereafter, in
compliance with the order dated 15.06.2012 passed by the
Additional Commissioner, portions of the said land were sold to
various purchasers including the present petitioner through a
registered sale deed dated 25.06.2012. Subsequently,
Respondent No.2 challenged the revenue proceedings and
carried the matter in appeal and thereafter in revision before the
competent authorities. The revision proceedings ultimately came
to be filed before Respondent No.1. According to the petitioners,
he being a purchaser of the disputed land is a necessary and
proper party to the said proceedings. However, he was not
impleaded at earlier stages and came to know about the pending
revision only subsequently, whereupon he filed an application
under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC seeking impleadment. The said
application has been rejected by the impugned order dated
09.10.2024, hence these petitions.
4. Following reliefs have been prayed by way of this petition:-
##PAGE4##4
“10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be
pleased to call for the entire records pertaining
to the case of the present Petitioner from the
Respondent authorities concerned for kind
perusal.
10.2 That
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.