##PAGE1##

1

2026:CGHC:19101

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

W.P(C) No.153 of 2025

1 - Smt. Pramila Pandey Wd/o Late Ashwini Pandey Aged About 60

Years R/o Devnandan Nagar Phase-2 Bilaspur, Tehsil And District

Bilaspur (C.G.)

2 - Apurva Pandey D/o Late Ashwini Pandey Aged About 30 Years

R/o Devnandan Nagar Phase-2 Bilaspur, Tehsil And District

Bilaspur (C.G.)

3 - Parag Pandey S/o Late Ashwini Pandey Aged About 30 Years

R/o Devnandan Nagar Phase-2 Bilaspur, Tehsil And District

Bilaspur (C.G.)

4 - Rameshwar Prasad Pandey S/o Kamla Prasad Pandey Aged

About 50 Years, R/o Village Dhamni Chakrabhata Bilaspur (C.G.)

5 - Savita Pandey D/o Kamla Prasad Pandey Aged About 54 Years

R/o Ahead Of Bagdai Mandir House No.8 Block No. K-2, I.H.S.D.P.

S.E.C.L. Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.)

SISTLA

NEELIMA

VISHNU

PRIYA

6 - Vijaya Laxmi Mishra D/o Kamla Prasad Pandey Aged About 53

Digitally signed by

SISTLA NEELIMA

VISHNU PRIYA

Date: 2026.04.28

17:07:42 +0530

2

Years R/o Ward No.34 Near Ganesh Mandir Railway Colony

Shahdol, District Shahdol (M.P.)

7 - Shrawan Pandey S/o Late Raghunandan Prasad Pandey Aged

About 70 Years R/o Vijayapuram Seepat Road Bilaspur Tehsil And

District Bilaspur (C.G.)

8 - Rajni Pandey W/o Late Praduman Pandey Aged About 50 Years

R/o Mata Choura House No.48, Old Bus Stand Sarkanda Tehsil

And Disrict Bilaspur (C.G.)

9 - Smt. Akansha Pandey D/o Late Praduman Pandey Aged About

25 Years R/o Mata Choura House No.48, Old Bus Stand Sarkanda

Tehsil And Disrict Bilaspur (C.G.)

10 - Adarsh Pandey S/o Praduman Pandey Aged About 28 Years

R/o Mata Choura House No.48, Old Bus Stand Sarkanda Tehsil

And Disrict Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioners

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary Department Of

Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya New Raipur

District Raipur (C.G.)

2 - The Collector District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

3 - Tahsildar, Bodri District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

4 - Halka Patwari Halka No. 1, Bodri Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur

(C.G.)

3

5 - Ratnesh Jaiswal S/o Late Ramesh Kumar Jaiswal Aged About

52 Years R/o Mungeli Naka Bilaspur, Tehsil And District- Bilaspur

(C.G.) ... Respondents

For Petitioners : Shri Nishikant Sinha, Advocate.

For Respondents No.1 to: Shri RK Gupta, Addl. A.G..

4/State

For Respondent No.5 : Shri Shrawan Agrawal, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Order on Board

25.04.2026

1. The present Writ Petition has been preferred assailing the

legality and validity of the impugned proceedings bearing Revenue

Case No.202411075700001/B-121/23-24 initiated by the Tahsildar,

Bodri (Respondent No.3) at the instance of Respondent No.5,

seeking recording of his alleged possession in Column No.12 of

the Khasra Panchshala pertaining to Khasra Nos.377, 378 and 379

admeasuring total area 7.49 acres situated at Village Bodri, Tahsil

Bodri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) with the following reliefs:-

“10.1 That, the respondents may kindly be directed by writ

of mandamus to forthwith produce the entire records of

Revenue Case no.202411075700001/B-121/23-24 pending

before the Tahsildar Bodri/ Respondent no. 3, for the

perusal before this Hon'ble Court.

10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set

aside the impugned complete proceedings of Revenue

Case no.202411075700001/B-121/23-24 initiated by the

Tahsildar Bodri/Respondent no. 3 on application filed by

the respondent no. 5, in the larger interest of justice.

4

10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to

restrain the respondent authorities from mutating the name

of the respondent no. 5 in column no. 12 of the Khasra

Panshala of Khasra No. 377 Rakba 2.36 Acre, Khasra No.

378 Rakba 2.71 Acre, 379 Rakba 2.42 Acre Total Rakba

7.49 Acre situated at village Bodri P.H.N-1Tahsil Bodri

District Bilaspur C.G.

10.4 Any other relief (s) that this Hon'ble Court may deem

fit to grant in the interest of Justice.”

2. Brief facts of the case are that the land in question is

admittedly recorded in the name of the Petitioners and the title

stands affirmed by the competent Civil Court. Further, the dispute

rel