2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 14722
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SANJAY KURREY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC/3836/2026
##PAGE1##
1
2026:CGHC:19634
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 3836 of 2026
Sanjay Kurrey S/o Late Doman Lal Kurrey Aged About 18 Years R/o
Deopuri, Satnamipara, Near To Jaitkhambh, P.S. Tikrapara, Tahsil And
District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Applicant
VAIBHAV
SINGH
Digitally signed by
VAIBHAV SINGH versus
Date: 2026.04.28
16:29:50 +0530
State Of Chhattisgarh Through S.H.O. P.S. Mana Camp, Raipur, District
Raipur Chhattisgarh ...Non-applicant
For Applicant : Mr. Pushkar Sinha, Advocates.
For Non-Applicant/State : Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Order on Board
28.04.2026
1.
The applicant has preferred this Second Bail Application under
Section 483 of B.N.S. for grant of regular bail, as he has been
arrested in connection with Crime No. 328/2025, registered at Police
Station : Mana Camp, Raipur District - Raipur (C.G) for the offence
punishable under Sections 309(6) 310(2) of the BNS 2023.
2.
The earlier bail application of the applicant was rejected by this
##PAGE2##2
Hon’ble Court vide order dated 18.03.2026 passed in MCRC No. 2555
of 2026, with liberty to file a fresh application after rejection of the
same by the trial Court for the offence under Section 310(2) of the
BNS.
3.
The prosecution case, in brief, is that the complainant lodged written
report and alleged that on 08.11.2025 at about 10:45 p.m near to his
house three person with covered their faces came to him and
assaulted to him by knife looted Rs 43,000/- from him. On the basis of
report FIR has been lodged for the offence under section 309 (6) of
B.N.S and during investigation on the basis of memorandum
statement of co accused, the applicant/accused has been arrested on
08.12.2025 and since he is in jail and after filing of charge sheet
offence under section 310 (2) of B.N.S has been added.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been
falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that as the applicant
has neither committed the alleged offence nor had any active
participation in its commission. The implication of the applicant is
based solely on the memorandum of a co-accused, which has no
evidentiary value in the absence of corroboration. There is no material
evidence on record connecting the applicant with the alleged offence,
and he has not caused any injury to the complainant; moreover, the
co-accused persons, who are alleged to have assaulted the
complainant, have already been enlarged on bail by the learned Court
below, and the injuries sustained are simple in nature. The applicant is
about 18 years of age, has been in custody since 08.12.2025, and is
the sole earning member of his family, with his aged mother
##PAGE3##3
dependent upon him, due to which the family is facing severe financial
hardship. The offence is triable by the learned JMFC and its final
disposal is likely to take time, therefore, considering the period of
detention, the applicant deserves to be released on bail. The applicant
is a permanent resident of the address mentioned in the cause title
and there is no likelihood of his absconding or tampering with the
prosecution evidence. He undertakes to abide by all terms and
conditions that may be imposed by this Hon’ble Court while granting
bail.
5.
On the other hand learned State counsel opposes the bail application
of the applicant and submits that the charge-sheet has been filed in
the present case.
6.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case
diary.
7.
Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the
nature of the allegations levelled against the applicant, and the fact
that the first bail application was rejected by this Hon’ble Court vide
order dated 18.03.2026 passed in MCRC No. 2555 of 2026, with
liberty to file a fresh application after rejection of the same by the trial
Court for the offence under Section 310(2) of the BNS, and further
considering that the present applicant has no previous criminal
antecedents and has been in custody since 08.12.2025, coupled with
the fact tha