SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 14837

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SANGITA YADAV – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


##PAGE1##

1

2026:CGHC:19723 NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WP227 No. 500 of 2026

1 - Sangita Yadav Wd/o Late Rohanlal Yadav Aged About 41 Years R/o Ward No. 22, Mouhari Bhatha, Tahsil And Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) 2 - Sonu Yadav S/o Late Rohanlal Yadav Aged About 23 Years R/o Ward No. 22, Mouhari Bhatha, Tahsil And Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) 3 - Mamta Yadav D/o Rohanal Yadav Aged About 25 Years W/o Lakeshwar Yadav, R/o Village- Piprahi, Tahsil- Chhura, Distt.

Gariyaband (C.G.)

4 - Anusuiya Bai D/o Kuleshwar Yadav Aged About 50 Years W/o Pritam Yadav, R/o Village- Khallari, Tahsil- Bagbahara, Distt. Mahasamund

(C.G.)

5 - Prembai D/o Kuleshwar Yadav Aged About 45 Years W/o Kumar Yadav, R/o Village- Khallari, Tahsil- Bagbahara, Distt. Mahasamund

(C.G.)

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - Union Of India Through Divisional Manager, East Cost Railway, Sambalpur, Distt. Sambalpur (Odisa)

... Respondent(s)

Digitally signed by SUGUNA SUGUNA DUBEY DUBEY Date:

2026.04.30

11:05:09 +0530

##PAGE2##

2

For Petitioner(s) : Shri Rajbahadur Singh, Advocate For Respondent/UOI : Shri Ramakant Mishra, DSGI assisted by

Shri Neeraj Baghel, Advocate

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)

Order on Board

28/04/2026

Hea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top