2026:CGHC:20164
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 2124 of 2026
M/s S.K. Industries Through Its Proprietor Sachin Khandelwal S/o- Shri Kishan Khandelwal, Aged 51 Year, R/o- Khasra No.394/1, 395/1, Dhamda Road, Chikli, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner
versus
1 - Union Of India Through Secretary, Department Of Food And Public Distribution, Ministry Of Consumer Affairs, Food And Public Distribution Krishi Bhawan, Rafi Marg, Connaught Place, Block E, Connaught Place, New Delhi, Delhi-110001
2 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh
3 - Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd. (Markfed), 6th Floor, Cbd Complex, Commercial Block C Sector 21, Barauda-1, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492018.
4 - District Marketing Officer, Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh.
5 - Food Corporation Of India, Through Its General Manager (Region), Chhattisgarh Region, Regional And District Office- Vidhansabha Road, Post- Pandri, Kapa, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Pin-492005
6 - Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Through Its Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Raipur, Block -7, A, 2nd Floor, Office Complex, Sector 24, Atal Nagarm Nava Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh.
7 - District Collector, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
| For Petitioner | : Mr. Ishan Verma, Advocate |
| For Respondent-State | : Mr. S.S. Choubey, Government Advocate |
| For Respondents No.3 and 4 | : Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate |
| For Respondent No.5 | : Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate |
Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge
Order on Board
30.04.2026
1. By filing the present writ petition, the petitioner assails the arbitrary inaction and apathy on the part of the respondents, particularly the Food Corporation of India (FCI), in failing to allot confirmed stacks and provide essential logistical support for deposit of Custom Milled Rice (CMR) under the Kharif Marketing Season 2024–25, despite valid subsisting agreements. It is contended that due to the respondents’ failure in ensuring timely stack allotment, labour availability and unloading facilities, the petitioner has been rendered incapable of performing its contractual obligations, and is now being exposed to coercive consequences, including forfeiture of bank guarantees, even though the delay is wholly attributable to the respondents. The petitioner has prayed for following reliefs :-
a. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondents Food Cooperation of India to allot stacks to the Petitioner expeditiously and without delay, and to ensure timely clearance and approval of lots so as to facilitate uninterrupted delivery of CMR;
b. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to concerned respondents to grant reasonable extension of time for completion of delivery of CMR beyond 30.04.2026;
c. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to restrain the Respondents from taking any coercive steps against the Petitioner;
d. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to complete delivery of Custom Milled Rice (CMR) for Kharif Marketing Season 2024-25 without imposing any penal consequences, considering the administrative and systemic constraints;
e. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondents to ensure smooth and timely acceptance of rice by: providing adequate labour at depots, ensuring timely unloading of trucks, allocating appropriate depots, ensuring proper stack allocation and clearance mechanisms.
f. Pass any other order(s), direction(s), or relief(s) which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. And for this act of kindness, the Petitioner, as in duty bound, shall ever pray.”
2. Brief facts of the case, in a nutshell, are that the petitioner is a rice miller engaged in custom milling of paddy under the Kharif Marketing Season (KMS) 2024–25 pursuant to agreements executed with the District Marketing Officer, Durg. In furtherance thereof, the petitioner entered into three Custom Milling Agreements dated 09.12.2024 and 18.12.2024 for specified lot numbers, requiring milling of paddy and delivery of Custom Milled Rice (CMR) to designated agencies including the Food Corporation of India (FCI) within the stipulated period, which was subsequently extended by the Government of India up to 30.04.2026.
3. During the subsistence of the said period, multiple administrative and logistical constraints arose at the level of the respondent authorities, including non-availability of labour at FCI depots, delay in unloading of trucks, improper depot allocation with ongoing rack operations, delay in allotment of stacks, shortage and subsequent discontinuation of Fortified Rice Kernels (FRK), non-availability of gunny bags, and recurring technical issues in the online systems governing allocation and delivery. Various communications issued by FCI, Markfed and the District Marketing Officer acknowledge these constraints and the resulting disruption in the CMR delivery process.
4. Despite repeated representations by the petitioner and the Rice Mill Association highlighting these issues, no effective remedial measures were undertaken. As a consequence, substantial quantity of CMR remains to be delivered, th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.