IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
OXYZO FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
Order on Board
Per, Ramesh Sinha, CJ.
1 The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking following reliefs:
“10.1 A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of certiorari do issue calling for records and quashing the Impugned Letter dated 13.04.2026 (Annexure P-16) illegally, arbitrarily, and malafidely issued by Respondent No. 3 to Respondent No. 8 for holding/freezing an amount of Rs. 53,47,17,835/- in the bank account of the Petitioner.
10.2 A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of mandamus do issue directing Respondent No. 8 to unconditionally defreeze and remove the hold/lien, if any on the Petitioner's bank account bearing No. 9913203430 in its entirety.
10.3 A writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ against Respondent No. 3 as to how they could have frozen a bank account of a lending institution without probable cause or notice;
10.4 A writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ against Respondent No. 4 to 6 as to how they could have given approvals and nod to Respondent No. 3 to freeze a bank account of a lending institution without probable cause or notice;
10.5 A writ and/or a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.