IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
DIBAKAR DUTTA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WPS/3939/2026
##PAGE1##
1
SYED
ROSHAN
ZAMIR
ALI
2026:CGHC:23065-DB
Digitally
signed
by SYED AFR
ROSHAN
ZAMIR
ALI
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 3939 of 2026
1. Dibakar Dutta S/o Late Putiram Dutta Aged About 60 Years
(Presently Aged About 70 Years) Retired Pointman Under
C.Y.M./ Bijuri/secr R/o Vivekanand Colony Ward No.1
Chanawariband Manendragarh Distt- Koriya (C.G.) 491442
... Petitioner
versus
1. Union of India Through- General Manager South East Central
Railway Bilaspur Zone Headquarters Office Bilaspur (C.G.)
495004
2. The Divisional Railway Manager South East Central Railway
Bilaspur (C.G.) 495004
3. The Senior Divisional Operations Manager S.E.C. Railway
Bilaspur (C.G.) 495004
4. The Chief Mining Adviser Railway Board Dhanbad (Bihar)
... Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. A.V. Shridhar, Advocate
For Respondents : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Dy. Solicitor General along
with Mr. Neeraj Baghel, Advocate
##PAGE2##2
DB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Parth Prateem Sahu,J
& Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sachin Singh Rajput, j
Order on Board
Per Parth Prateem Sahu, J
14.05.2026
1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:-
“10.1.That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be
pleased to call for entire records pertaining to
the case of the petitioner.
10.2. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased
to quash the impugned order dated 12.08.2025
passed in O.A. No.203/721/20216by the
Learned Central Administrative Tribunal,
Jabalpur Bench.
10.3. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased
to grant relief as claimed by the petitioner in
the O.A. No.203/721/2016.
10.4. Any other relief in the facts and circumstances
of the case which the Hon’ble Court deems fit
and proper may be passed.”
2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that petitioner was appointed in
the Railway Department as Sample Khalasi in the scale of
Rs.196-232/- w.e.f. 20.1.1977 and posted under Chief Mining
Adviser, Railway Board, Dhanbad. In the year 1994, number
of employees, including petitioner herein, were declared
surplus due to winding up of coal organization (closure of
steam loco sheds). Petitioner along with others was screened
##PAGE3##3
for alternative job in the Railways and was spared for Asansol
Division. Petitioner requested for his absorption against ‘D’
category vacancies in Bilaspur Division, which was allowed
vide order dated 05.12.1994 and he was absorbed in Bilaspur
Division in ‘D’ category in the grade of Rs.740-940/-and
posted as Pointman in Bijuri Station, however, the petitioner
was not allowed the same basic already drawn by him i.e.
Rs.1050/- with allowance. Petitioner submitted representation
before the authority concerned seeking pay protection from
the date of his absorption in Bilaspur Division, w.e.f.
5.12.1994, on the ground that according to instructions
contained in Railway Establishment Board No.129/2022 dated
08.08.20002, after declaring surplus, petitioner ought to have
been redeployed on a special supernumerary post in the
same grade which he was drawing when declared surplus.
Petitioner stood retired from service on 31.5.2015 and his
representation remains undecided. Petitioner approached the
Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench (for short ‘the
Tribunal’), by filing Original Application No.203/721/2016
seeking a direction for respondents to consider his pending
representation and initiate action to protect his pay and
emoluments drawn while being declared surplus and to
recalculate the pension and other retiral benefits within a time
bound period. The Tribunal dismissed the original application
##PAGE4##4
holding it to be barred by limitation period prescribed under
Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (for short
‘the Act of 1985’).
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that according to REB
No.129/2002, the employees declared surplus are required to
be redeployed by creating a special supernumerary post in
the same grade. Petitioner was declared surplus in the scale
of 800-1150/- and therefore, he could not have been
absorbed in the lower grade of Rs.750-940/- and as such,
present is the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.