IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
ROHIT KUMAR TONDON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC/2450/2026
##PAGE1##
1
2026:CGHC:22960
Digitally
signed by
SHAYNA
NAFR
KADRI
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 2450 of 2026
1 - Rohit Kumar Tondon S/o Fatteram Tondon Aged About 40 Years
Occupation Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Kishungarh, Janpad Panchayat
Pandariya, District- Kabirdham (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of
Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan,
Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.)
2 - The Collector, Kabirdham, District- Kabirdham (C.G.)
3 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Kabirdham District-
Kabirdham (C.G.)
4 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pandariya District-
Kabirdham (C.G.)
5 - Ramadhar Sahu Secretary Gram Panchayat Kishungarh, Pandariya
District- Kabirdham (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
(Cause Title is taken from CIS System)
:
For Petitioner Mr. Manish Kumar Sahu, Advocate
:
For State Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. Govt. Advocate
##PAGE2##2
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
14/05/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:
10.1 Issue a writ in the nature of
Mandamus directing Respondent No. 3
to immediately comply with the
proposal dated 20.04.2026 and remove
Respondent No. 5 from the post of
Secretary, Gram Panchayat
Kishungarh.
10.2 Set aside the posting order dated
20.02.2026 insofar as it relates to the
appointment of Respondent No. 5 at
Gram Panchayat Kishungarh.
10.3 Direct the Respondent Authorities
to appoint a competent Secretary to
ensure the smooth functioning of the
Gram Panchayat and the
implementation of welfare schemes.
10.4 Any other relief which this Hon'ble
Court deems fit in the facts and
circumstances of the case.”
2. Facts of the case, as projected, are that the present petition has
been filed alleging inaction on the part of the respondent
authorities in taking a final decision on the proposal for removal of
##PAGE3##3
respondent No. 5 from the post of Secretary of Gram Panchayat
Kishungarh. As per the pleadings, respondent No. 5 was posted
as Secretary of Gram Panchayat Kishungarh vide order dated
20.02.2026 issued by respondent No. 3. After his joining, the
petitioner and other public representatives allegedly noticed
several irregularities and instances of negligence in discharge of
official duties, pursuant to which a complaint dated 16.03.2026
was submitted against respondent No. 5. The allegations
pertained to non-registration of births and deaths, withholding of
census records affecting admissions of students, refusal to sign
applications relating to ration cards and job cards, and failure to
discharge statutory duties under the Panchayat Raj Act. It has
further been stated that, upon receipt of the complaint, an inquiry
was conducted and the inquiry report dated 13.04.2026 found
respondent No. 5 guilty of various lapses, including non-residence
at headquarters, failure to open the Panchayat office regularly,
manipulation of records relating to meeting notices, and failure to
conduct mandatory monthly meetings under Section 44 of the
Panchayat Raj Act, which allegedly resulted in financial loss to the
Gram Panchayat. Thereafter, respondent No. 4 forwarded a
proposal dated 20.04.2026 to respondent No. 3 recommending
removal of respondent No. 5 and initiation of disciplinary
proceedings against him. Since no final action has been taken on
the said proposal, the petitioner has approached this Court
seeking appropriate directions.
##PAGE4##4
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No. 5
has committed serious irregularities and misconduct while
functioning as Secretary of Gram Panchayat Kishungarh. It is
contended that despite a detailed inquiry report finding
respondent No. 5 guilty of negligence, arbitrariness and
manipulation of official records, no final order has been passed by
the competent authority on the recommendation for his removal.
Learned counsel further submits that respondent No. 5 failed to
conduct monthly meetings as mandated under Section 44 of the
Panchayat Raj Act, resul
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.