IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SMT. DEVKI CHAKRADHARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC/1398/2022
##PAGE1##
1
2026:CGHC:22850
NAFR
SHYNA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
AJAY
Digitally signed WPC No. 1398 of 2022
by SHYNA AJAY
Date:
2026.05.16
16:39:30 +0530
Smt. Devki Chakradhari W/o Shri Ramu Singh Chakradhari, Aged About
48 Years, Occupation House Wife, Ex Sarpanch Of Gram Panchayat
Datrengi, Janpad Panchayat Palari, R/o Village And Post Datrengi,
District Balodabajar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Panchayat And Rural
Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan Capital Complex, Atal
Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2 - Collector Balodabajar District Balodabajar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Balodabajar District Balodabajar
Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
4 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Palari, District
Balodabajar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s)
(Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate
For Respondent(s) : Mr. SS Choubey, Government Advocate
##PAGE2##2
SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
14/05/2026
1. The petitioner challenges the recovery order dated 4.2.2022 for
Rs.30,06,539/-, passed by Respondent No.3- Sub Divisional
Officer(R), Balodabajar, District Balodabajar-Bhatapara (CG). The
petitioner contends that the order was passed without due inquiry
and Respondent No.3 acted without jurisdiction under Section 92
of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 (in short “the Act”).
Furthermore, the petitioner asserts that Section 89 of the Act is
the sole provision governing adjudication of liability and that the
power to conduct such enquiry is vested exclusively in the
Collector (prescribed authority). Since the mandatory procedure of
adjudication was bypassed in favour of recovery proceedings, the
order suffers from a manifest legal error. Hence, the petitioner
seeks quashing of the said order.
2. By way of this Petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs : -
10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be
pleased to issue an appropriate writ by
quashing the impugned order dated
04.02.2022 (Annexure P-1) with complete
proceedings of Revenue Case No.
202012210200030/92-A/89/2020-21
(Annexure P-2) pending before SDO
Revenue Balodabajar, District Balodabojar
Bhatapara (C.G.)
2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be
##PAGE3##3
pleased to call for the record from the Court
of Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)
Balodabajar with Inquiry report if any for
kind perusal of this Hon'ble court.
3. Any other relief, which may be suitable
in the facts and circumstances of the case,
may also be granted.
3. Succinctly stated, the facts of the case are that the petitioner is
the former Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Datrengi, Janpad
Panchayat Bilaigarh (District Balodabazar), elected in 2015. After
a 2019 news report regarding sand mining/royalty irregularities, an
enquiry committee alleged that Rs.30,06,539/- was mismanaged
by the Panchayat. Based solely on the enquiry, respondent No.4
communicated respondent No.3 {SDO(R)} to recover the amount
from the petitioner. A recovery case was registered in 2020 and a
show cause notice was issued to the petitioner. The petitioner
contends that Section 92 of the Act (Recovery) was invoked
prematurely and illegally. The petitioner filed a reply and also filed
an application on 18.10.2021 challenging the maintainability of
recovery proceedings. The petitioner raised a preliminary
objection that an enquiry and adjudication under Section 89 of the
Act must be completed as prerequisite before any recovery
execution under Section 92 can commence. On 4.2.2022, the
Presiding Officer dismissed this plea without considering that no
formal order of liability had been passed. The concerned SDO(R)
has now ordered the petitioner to deposit the amount or face 30
days in civil jail, despite lack of a proper hearing or witness
statements. Hence, this Petition.
##PAGE4##4
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned
recovery order suffers from non-application of mind, denial
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.