IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MOHAMMAD MUNAF KHATRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC/4581/2026
##PAGE1##
1
Digitally 2026:CGHC:23009
signed by
VAISHALI
VAISHALILUCKY
LUCKY NAGARIA NAFR
NAGARIA Date:
2026.05.18
14:38:16
+0530
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 4581 of 2026
1 - Mohammad Munaf Khatri S/o Late Mohammad Harun Khatri,
Aged About 48 Years R/o Ward No. 06, Kabir Nagar, Nearby Bharat
Gas, Basna, Police Station Basna, District- Mahasamund (C.G.)
2 - Tahira Bano W/o Mohammad Munaf Khatri Aged About 48 Years
R/o Ward No. 06, Kabir Nagar, Nearby Bharat Gas, Basna, Police
Station Basna, District- Mahasamund (C.G.)
... Applicant(s)
versus
1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Of
Police Station City Kotwali Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title is taken from Case Information System)
For Applicant(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Gulati, Advocate
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Soumya Rai, Dy.G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice
Order on Board
14.05.2026
1. This is the second bail application filed under Section 483 of the
BNSS for grant of regular bail to the applicants who have been
arrested in connection with Crime No. 154/2025 registered at
Police Station - City Kotwali Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, (C.G.)
for the offence punishable under Sections 331(4), 305(A) read
with 3(5) and 111(2)(b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
##PAGE2##2
(BNS).
2. The earlier bail application of the applicants being MCRC No.
10043 of 2025 was rejected by this Court vide order dated
10.12.2025 on merits.
3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the FIR was lodged
by one Ayodhya Prasad Pandey, who is the priest/Pujari at
Durga Mandir Ratnabandha situated at Dhamtari and it was
alleged in the FIR that in the intervening night of 17-05-2025 to
18-05-2025, some unknown persons entered into the temple
broken the lock of temple and stolen the money and silver
ornaments. Subsequently the matter being investigated by the
police and initially the applicants alongwith other accused
persons have been arrested in respect of crime No.165/2025
and the memorandum statement of applicants and other
accused persons were recorded in respect of Crime
No.165/2025 and the memorandum and seizure of crime
No.165/2025 was used in the present crime also and nothing
has been seized from the applicants in respect of the present
crime number.
4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that, the first bail
application of the applicants was rejected by this Court on
merits. He submits that the present applicants are innocent and
have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted
that during investigation, memorandum statements of the
applicants were recorded in Crime No.165/2025 of Police
Station Kurud and seizure was also made only in that case. It is
##PAGE3##3
further submitted that the said memorandum and seizure of
Crime No.165/2025 have been relied upon by the prosecution
to implicate the applicants in other cases including the present
Crime No.157/2025. He further submits that though certain
criminal cases have been shown against the applicants, there is
in fact no independent criminal antecedent against them, and
all the cases have been registered only on the basis of a single
memorandum statement recorded in Crime No.165/2025. It is
submitted that on the basis of the said one memorandum
statement, as many as seven criminal cases including the
present case have been registered, without any separate
recovery or independent material, and therefore the alleged
criminal antecedents are not genuine. He further submits that
co-accused Mahmuda Begam has already been enlarged on bail
by this Hon’ble Court in MCRC No.3543/2026, 3566/2026,
3560/2026, 3555/2026 and 3544/2026 vide order dated
20.04.2026, and the case of the present applicants stands on
similar footing. It is further submitted that there is no recovery
from the possession of the applicants in the present Crime
No.154/2025 and the case is based only on memorandum. It is
also submitted that there are total 13 witnesses, out of which
08 have been examined, and trial will take time. The applicants
are i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.