##PAGE1##

1

2026:CGHC:22709

Digitaly

signed by

SUMIT S KU UM MI AT R

KUMAR Date:

2026.05.14

11:27:19

+0530 NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WP227 No. 251 of 2026

1 - Smt. Kaliya Bai Yadav W/o Late Lakhanlal Yadav Aged About 76 Years

R/o Village Samoda, Block Arang, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2 - Dayalu Ram Yadav S/o Late Lakhanlal Yadav Aged About 60 Years R/o

Village Samoda, Block Arang, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3 - Shiyalu Ram Yadav S/o Late Lakhanlal Yadav Aged About 58 Years R/o

Village Samoda, Block Arang, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4 - Laluram Yadav S/o Late Lakhanlal Yadav Aged About 56 Years R/o Village

Samoda, Block Arang, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

5 - Radheshyam Yadav S/o Late Lakhanlal Yadav Aged About 43 Years R/o

Village Samoda, Block Arang, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

6 - Smt. Lata Bai W/o Sant Kumar Yadav Aged About 52 Years R/o Parsada,

Near Stadium, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

7 - Smt. Geeta Bai W/o Neelkanth Yadav Aged About 50 Years R/o Village

Rajkatthi (Jamgaon) Fingeshwar, Distt. Gariyaband Chhattisgarh.

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - Smt. Sukaro Bai Dewangan W/o Shri Manharan Dewangan R/o Village

Samoda, Revenue Circle Arang, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2

2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

... Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hirashig Bhoshle, Advocate

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikhyat Arora, Panel Lawyer for the State

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.)

Order on Board

13/05/2026

1. Heard.

2. Present is a writ petition filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India against the impugned order dated 09.01.2026

passed by learned Civil Judge Junior Division, Arang, District – Raipur

(C.G.) in Civil Suit No. 156-A/2018 whereby the application filed by the

petitioner for permission to exhibit the documents filed by him has been

rejected.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is

the plaintiff before the learned trial Court and the case is at the

plaintiff’s evidence stage before the trial Court. On 14.10.2025, the

documents filed by the petitioner/plaintiff was allowed to be taken on

record subject to payment of cost of Rs. 500/-, thereafter, another

application for re-examination of the plaintiff was also allowed vide

order dated 12.08.2025 subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1000/- and

the plaintiff was permitted to get the document exhibited in evidence,

thereafter, the plaintiff examined P.W.-5 Kaliya Yadav and P.W.-6

Shyam Lal Dhruv on 03.11.2025 and 02.12.2025 respectively,

3

thereafter, he filed another application on 02.12.2025 for exhibiting the

remaining documents in the evidence, the said application filed by the

plaintiff has been rejected by the learned trial Court on the ground that

sufficient opportunity was already provided to the plaintiff to exhibit the

documents which has been relied by him in accordance with law,

however, he availed his entire opportunity and the case is pending

since 2018, therefore, he can not be again permitted to get the

document exhibited, and therefore, the application filed by the plaintiff

has been rejected. He would further submit that the documents which

the plaintiff is relied upon in support of his case is the vital documents

and necessary to be exhibited during the evidence. He would also

submit that the defendants witness have not been started yet. He

would further submit that the defendant has not prejudiced and have

the every right to cross-examine the plaintiff’s witness about the said

document, therefore, the plaintiff/petitioner may be permitted to get the

document exhibited during the evidence and for this limited purpose

the present petition has been filed.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the

document annexed with the petition.

5. From perusal of the order sheet dated 09.01.2026, it transpires that the

application of the plaintiff has been rejected on the ground that

sufficient opportunity has been provided to him for recording his

evidence and to get