IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SHIVSHANKAR PATHAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC/2436/2026
##PAGE1##
1
Digitally
signed
by 2026:CGHC:22485
SHAYNA
KADRI
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 2436 of 2026
1 - Shivshankar Pathak S/o Lt. Shri Rameshwar Prasad Pathak Aged
About 76 Years R/o Ganj Para, Bans Taal, Behind Deshbandhu, Station
Road, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Revenue And Disaster
Management Department 1-13, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava
Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2 - Collector District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh
3 - Tahsildar Berla District Bemetara Chhattisgarh
4 - Shivdayal Pathak S/o Rameshwar Pathak Aged About 80 Years R/o
Village Khamahariya, Tehsil Berla, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
(Cause Title is taken from CIS System)
For Petitioner : Mr. Anumeh Shrivastava, Advocate
For State : Mr. S. S. Choubey, Government Advocate
##PAGE2##2
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
13/05/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:
“10.1 Issue an appropriate
writ/order/direction to quash and set
aside the impugned demarcation report
dated 13.04.2026 (Annexure P/1) and
the related proceedings of Case No.
202604231200002/A/12 Year 2025-26;
and/or
10.2 Issue an appropriate
writ/order/direction to the Respondent
No. 3 (Tehsildar) to act in accordance
with law and only proceed after
deciding the pending objections within a
stipulated time frame; and/or.
10.3 Pass any other order(s) as this
Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper
in the interest of justice.
2. Facts of the case, as projected, are that the petitioner has filed the
present writ petition contending that he is in lawful possession and
##PAGE3##3
occupation of the subject land bearing Kh. No. 595/3 situated at
Village Khamariya (M), Tahsil Berla, District Bemetara (C.G.). The
petitioner submits that he is directly affected by the demarcation
proceedings initiated by the respondent authorities. It is averred
that earlier demarcation proceedings were conducted after due
notice to all concerned parties and a demarcation report dated
01.07.2024 was prepared in favour of the petitioner.
Subsequently, on an application moved by one Shiv Dayal
Pathak, the Revenue Inspector issued notice dated 28.05.2025
for fresh demarcation proceedings. The petitioner immediately
submitted objections and representations dated 30.05.2025,
06.06.2025 and 17.06.2025 before the competent authorities
pointing out various irregularities and illegality in the proposed
proceedings. The petitioner further submits that despite
pendency of objections and revision proceedings under Section
50 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code before the Collector,
the respondent authorities proceeded with demarcation by issuing
repeated notices and constituting demarcation teams. It is also
alleged that notices were issued through paper publication and
affixture instead of proper personal service. The record further
reflects that W.P. No. 4516/2025 preferred by Shiv Dayal Pathak
was disposed of directing the authorities to decide the
applications expeditiously and thereafter, in Review Petition No.
46/2026, this Court modified the earlier order and directed that the
##PAGE4##4
objections raised by the present petitioner be considered before
proceeding further in the matter. The grievance of the petitioner is
that despite the aforesaid directions, the Tahsildar proceeded with
the demarcation proceedings in haste, without granting effective
opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and ultimately passed the
impugned demarcation report dated 13.04.2026. It is further
contended that multiple demarcation cases in respect of the same
land have been initiated causing serious prejudice and multiplicity
of litigation.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire
demarcation proceedings have been conducted in gross violation
of principles of natural justice and contrary to the directions issued
earlier by this Court in Review Petition No. 46/2026. It is argued
that though several objections and representations
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.