2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 15882
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
VIVEK KESHARWANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRCA/636/2026
##PAGE1##
1
2026:CGHC:22668
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 636 of 2026
Vivek Kesharwani S/o Ramji Resharwani, Aged About 30 Years R/o
Chhote Mathpara Ward No. 9/12, Sarangarh, District -Sarangarh,
Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh,
... Applicant
versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, Police Station
Sarangarh, District Sarangarh, Bilaigarh, C.G.
... Non-applicant
For Applicant : Mr. Aman Tamboli, Advocate
For Non-applicant/State : Ms. Sameeksha Gupta, Panel Lawyer.
For Objector/Complainant : Mr. Devendra Pratap Singh, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Order On Board
13/05/2026
1. This first anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the
Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the
applicant, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime
No. 159/2026 registered at Police Station – Sarangarh, District
Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, (C.G.) for the offences punishable under
Sections 115(2), 351(3), and 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,
2023.
RAHUL
DEWANGAN
Digitally
signed by
RAHUL
DEWANGAN
##PAGE2##2
2. The prosecution's story, in brief, is that the complainant, who is the
wife of the present applicant, lodged a report before the police
alleging that she was subjected to cruelty by the applicant on the
pretext of demand of dowry. It is further alleged that the applicant
was found in an objectionable position with another girl on
24.02.2026 and that he was having alleged affairs with other
women. It is also alleged that on 07.04.2026, the complainant was
assaulted by the applicant when she objected to his conduct and
started recording the incident on her mobile phone, whereupon the
applicant allegedly snatched her mobile handset and broke it. On
the basis of the aforesaid allegations, FIR has been registered
against the applicant and he is apprehending his arrest in the said
crime. Hence, the present application for grant of anticipatory bail.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is
innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case for
oblique and ulterior motives and that no offence as alleged by the
prosecution is made out against him. It is further submitted that the
applicant is a law-abiding and peace-loving citizen having no
criminal antecedents whatsoever. He further submits that the
complainant is a disgruntled wife who is not willing to reside in the
matrimonial home and is not performing her marital obligations and
since the inception of marriage she has been creating unnecessary
disputes over trivial issues, thereby making the applicant’s life
miserable. It is also submitted that the applicant is the sole bread
earner of his family, his parents are senior citizens suffering from
health issues, and in the event of his arrest the entire family would
##PAGE3##3
face severe hardship and irreparable loss. It is further submitted
that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on
04.02.2024 as per Hindu rites and rituals, and neither the applicant
nor his family members ever demanded any dowry from the
complainant or her family, who are in fact running a small fruit shop
in Bilaspur near Brihaspati Market. He also submits that after the
unfortunate demise of the applicant’s elder brother, the family has
been under severe financial and emotional distress, and the parents
of the applicant have been frequently unwell. It is also contended
that the complainant is well aware of the difÏcult circumstances of
the applicant’s family, yet she is insisting on living separately due to
personal differences with the sister-in-law, which has led to frequent
disputes in the family. He further submits that this matter was
previously listed before this Hon’ble Court on 29.04.2026, and was
referred for mediation, which took place on 08.05.2026. Although
both parties appeared, the mediation ultimately failed, therefore, he
prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the present applicant.
4. On the other hand, learned State counsel as well as learned counsel
for the objector has opposed the prayer for gra