IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
BEDRAM – Appellant
Versus
BISANI – Respondent
SA/318/2018
##PAGE1##
SOURABH DsSPi AOigg TnUi EteRad Ll A by ByH
PATEL D21+05a 02:t 51e6 35:. 00:559.15
1
2026:CGHC:22634
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SA No. 318 of 2018
1 - Bedram Firanta, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Dundera,
Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
2 - Narayan, Firanta, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Dundera,
Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
3 - Tilak Firanta, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Dundera, Tahsil
And District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
... Appellants/Plaintiffs
versus
1 - Bisani Firanta, Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Urla, Durg,
Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
2 - Savitri, Firanta, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Bori, District
Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
3 - Narayani, Firanta, Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Chunkatta,
Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
4 - Ferhi, Kheduram, Aged About 60 Years R/o M. Jamgaon, District
Durg, Chhattisgarh.
5 - Thagiya, Kheduram, Aged About 55 Years R/o Santoshi Para,
Supela Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
6 - Firan, Kheduram, Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Nandai
Chowk, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon,
Chhattisgarh.
7 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through District Collector, Durg, Tahsil
And District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents/Defendants
For Appellant : Mr. Arvind Dubey, Advocate.
For State/Respondent : Mr. Anand Gupta, Dy.G.A.
No. 7
##PAGE2##2
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Order on Board
13.05.2026
1. Heard on admission.
2. This second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'CPC') has been filed by the
appellants, assailing the legality, correctness and validity of the
judgment and decree dated 28.03.2018 passed by the 3rd
Additional District Judge, Durg (C.G.) in Civil Appeal No. 11-
A/2013, whereby the appeal filed by the appellants under
Section 96 of the CPC was dismissed and the judgment and
decree dated 13.12.2012 passed by the 2nd Additional Civil
Judge, Class-I, Durg (C.G.) (for short, 'Trial Court') in Civil Suit
No. 149-A/2012 was affirmed. The parties are referred to as per
their status before the learned Trial Court.
3. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the plaintiffs filed a civil
suit in respect of the suit property comprising Khasra Nos.
1057, 1076 and 1078, admeasuring 0.54, 0.68 and 0.31
hectares respectively, i.e., total area 1.53 hectares, situated at
Village Dundera, P.H. No. 30, R.I. Mandal Anda, Tahsil and
District Durg (C.G.). The suit was filed for partition, declaration
of title and permanent injunction in respect of the suit property.
4. The plaintiffs and defendant Nos. 1 to 3 are real siblings, and
defendant Nos. 4 to 6 are the step sister of father of the
plaintiffs. As per the further pleadings of the plaintiffs,
defendant Nos. 4 to 6 were married during the lifetime of the
plaintiffs' grandfather and are residing in their matrimonial
##PAGE3##3
homes. After the death of their father, Khedu Ram, defendant
Nos. 4 to 6 never claimed any right over the suit property, and
thus the plaintiffs are in possession of the suit property. It is the
further case of the plaintiffs that defendant Nos. 1 to 3 were
married during the lifetime of their father and they have never
claimed any share in the suit property. The father of the
plaintiffs died in the year 1988. The plaintiffs and defendant
Nos. 1 to 3 are entitled to receive their respective shares
according to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. It is further
pleaded that after the death of their father, defendant Nos. 4 to
6 made an application before the Court of Tahsildar for partition
and got the suit property partitioned in their favour in the year
2009 without affording an opportunity of hearing to the
plaintiffs, which is illegal. It is further pleaded that defendant
Nos. 4 to 6 are not entitled to any share by partition and that
defendant Nos. 1 to 3 have relinquished their share in the suit
property; despite that, the plaintiffs are ready to give defendant
Nos. 1 to 3 their proper share.
5. Thus, on the basis of the aforesaid pleadings, a prayer for
par
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.