IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SUNIL KUMAR KERKETTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC/4418/2026
##PAGE1##
1
Digitally
signed by
ABHISHEK
ABHISHEK SHRIVAS 2026:CGHC:22330
SHRIVAS Date:
2026.05.13
11:12:32 NAFR
+0530
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 4418 of 2026
Sunil Kumar Kerketta S/o Shri Gareeb Sai Aged About 28 Years R/o -Village
Maharanipur P.S. And Tehsil Sitapur District Surguja (C.G.)
… Applicant
versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, P.S. Sitapur District
Surguja (C.G.)
... Non-applicant
For Applicant : Mr. Nishi Kant Sinha, Advocate.
For Non-applicant/State. : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Order on Board
12.05.2026
1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant
who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 21/2022 registered
at Police Station Sitapur, District - Surguja (C.G.), for the offences
punishable under Sections 409 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code
2. As per the prosecution story, a report was lodged by the complainant,
Ashutosh Kujur, Assistant Engineer, C.G. State Power Distribution Co.
Ltd., alleging misappropriation of government funds to the tune of Rs.
2,92,62,207/-. A departmental inquiry was conducted by a committee for
the financial years 2019 to 22.10.2021, wherein it was alleged that there
##PAGE2##2
was a mismatch between the documents and the computer entries. It
was further alleged that the daily revenue/bill amount collected in cash
from consumers was entered into the computer, and after totalling the
daily collection, the cash was deposited in the bank. Thereafter, along
with the bank receipt, the C.R.A. (Cash Receipt Audit) report was
prepared and submitted before the Senior Accounting OfÏcer. It is
specifically alleged that, for punching cash entries of Sitapur and Petla,
the SAP ID was provided to Arvind Sagar, and for Mainpat, the SAP ID
was provided to Ganesh Prasad Singh, which could only be used by
them. It is further alleged that in Sitapur, an amount of Rs. 2,15,92,052/-
was found to have been misappropriated. Likewise, in Mainpat, Rs.
29,26,207/- and in Petla, Rs. 49,11,223/- were found to have been
misappropriated. Hence, the present offence has been registered against
the applicant and the co-accused persons.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present applicant is
innocent person and has been falsely been implicated in the foresaid
case. He submits that the applicant was appointed to the post of Line
Conductor on a contractual basis, and his place of duty was Village
Petla. The duty assigned to the applicant was to collect the bill amount
and hand over the same to the Punching OfÏcer of the Village Petla
Distribution Centre, who, in the present case, was Arvind Sagar.
Moreover, the applicant was neither assigned the duty of making any
entry in the computer nor of preparing the C.R.A. report. Therefore, the
applicant could not have misappropriated the funds and bill amounts, as
alleged by the prosecution. He also submits that the applicant’s duties
were confined only to Village Petla and did not extend to Sitapur and
Mainpat, where misappropriation of government funds has also been
alleged. The applicant has been made a scapegoat by the higher
##PAGE3##3
authorities in order to shift the blame upon him and evade responsibility,
for the reason that the applicant is a lower cadre employee working as a
Line Conductor, who had no authority to misappropriate the bill amount,
nor did he possess the SAP ID and password through which the cash
receipts were punched into the computer. He submits that the present
applicant has no criminal antecedents and he is in jail since 21.01.2026,
conclusion of the trial may take some time, therefore, he prays for grant
of regular bail.
4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application of
the present applicant and submits that the charge-sheet has already
been submitted before the competent Court in the present case. He
submits that the applicant is involved in a serious economic offence
conc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.